IMDb RATING
5.3/10
2.5K
YOUR RATING
A daring dream to scale the world's most challenging trio of mountains soon turns into a terrifying nightmare for a group of friends when a deadly storm traps the climbers near the summit an... Read allA daring dream to scale the world's most challenging trio of mountains soon turns into a terrifying nightmare for a group of friends when a deadly storm traps the climbers near the summit and cuts off all hope of rescue.A daring dream to scale the world's most challenging trio of mountains soon turns into a terrifying nightmare for a group of friends when a deadly storm traps the climbers near the summit and cuts off all hope of rescue.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.32.5K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
6.4/10. Recommended
If you liked EVEREST (2015), FREE SOLO (2018), THE ALPINIST (2021), you will probably like this too. It's not as good as the aforementioned movie and documentaries, it's a low budget production and acting is mediocre, however, it's better than i thought it would be.
There are some impressive mountain shots, tension, acting is not bad and the ending is good. It is not much intense, your heart is not gonna beat faster, but these are 2 hours well spent, providing that you like these activities, i mean mountain climbing. If you are interested in this way of life (climbing and other dangerous activities), there is a kinda accurate depiction of it in this movie, and you will find it interesting.
It's not a great movie, probably it's not a good either, but i enjoy it. Read the plot and you will know what this is about. If you think it is interesting, watch it, you will not get disappointed. 4.9/10 is not a fair rating.
There are some impressive mountain shots, tension, acting is not bad and the ending is good. It is not much intense, your heart is not gonna beat faster, but these are 2 hours well spent, providing that you like these activities, i mean mountain climbing. If you are interested in this way of life (climbing and other dangerous activities), there is a kinda accurate depiction of it in this movie, and you will find it interesting.
It's not a great movie, probably it's not a good either, but i enjoy it. Read the plot and you will know what this is about. If you think it is interesting, watch it, you will not get disappointed. 4.9/10 is not a fair rating.
so so so so good
The writers, producers, and directors put a lot of love into this movie. The actors were excellent and the climbers were superb. The story line was actually great... a lot of characters you really feel for in the end. The shots were amazing, really took my breath away. For any climbers out there, they actually had real climbers doing crazy stuff; awesome to see. In most climbing movies, the story lines are cheesy and just TOO fictional; they also usually have non-climbers trying to act out climbing scenes and it just looks BAD. Definitely NOT the case in Summit Fever. You can tell the actors actually trained in the sport before climbing, and the stunt doubles were real pros. Plus the stories of love and friendship were genuine and real. Icing on the cake was the super 8 film video at the end. Overall the movie was beautiful and acting was phenomenal!
Not much plot here
SUMMIT FEVER is one of the more disappointing mountaineering films out there, mainly because it has no real plot. At least thrillers like CLIFFHANGER and A LONELY PLACE TO DIE (which director Julian Gilbey also made) had thriller plots with a mountaineering backdrop, which gave them drive and narrative coherency. Here, we just get a group of dull young friends (and added Hollywood star Ryan Philippe for name value) who decide to go climb a few mountains. Tragedy strikes on occasion, but it's not very thrilling or indeed involving. Gilbey obviously has a real-life passion for mountaineering but I do wonder if this would have just worked better as a documentary.
Tokenism at it's finest
In my opinion, the most glaring part of this movie is the one black character, Rudi, that appears in the beginning of the movie as part of the group, but then suddenly disappears, appearing only in the background until the last half of the film, and then disappears again. He's the only character whose story never gets fleshed out in any way, and never gets an official ending. Sad to see tokenism is still alive and well.
Other than that, it's an engaging film, the climbing scenes are done very well, and I found the lead actor particularly talented. However, one other oddity of this film were the touches of old school nods such as the disposable camera, the film camera, the 1950s looking radio, etc.. If you enjoy films about climbing and climbers, you'll probably enjoy this film.
Other than that, it's an engaging film, the climbing scenes are done very well, and I found the lead actor particularly talented. However, one other oddity of this film were the touches of old school nods such as the disposable camera, the film camera, the 1950s looking radio, etc.. If you enjoy films about climbing and climbers, you'll probably enjoy this film.
Worse than expected
There was a good film in in here somewhere, however, I feel that poor execution, casting, and weak writing (specifically the first half) let the entire concept down. If you can manage to get past the first 45min the film does become significantly more eventful and entertaining.....aided by lower reliance on the character "background" stories and any actual acting.
That being said, it's the first time since The Avengers (1998) that I kept looking at my watch praying for the agony to stop.
In terms of redemption, the climbing scenes were well executed and there are some beautiful cinematic sequences of the mountains.
Probably not the worst film I've ever seen, and I've likely been harsh with my rating so take with a pinch of salt.
That being said, it's the first time since The Avengers (1998) that I kept looking at my watch praying for the agony to stop.
In terms of redemption, the climbing scenes were well executed and there are some beautiful cinematic sequences of the mountains.
Probably not the worst film I've ever seen, and I've likely been harsh with my rating so take with a pinch of salt.
Did you know
- TriviaThe last shot of the film really does feature Freddie Thorp ascending a 300 metre/1000 foot cliff face in the Arve Valley near Chamonix - though he is shown to be free-soloing (using no rope), he had a top rope attached to him and he had a harness under his trousers - the rope was digitally erased in post production. NB - the rope was not aiding his climbing, it was merely there for his safety (he is free climbing but NOT free solo climbing).
- ConnectionsReferences A View to a Kill (1985)
- How long is Summit Fever?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Гірська лихоманка
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $648,353
- Runtime
- 1h 55m(115 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content






