Engaged to a Psycho

This movie should have been called "engaged to a beta-male mamma's boy". It is a sorry testament to women's propensity to put up with literally ANYTHING, as long as their suitor is rich. Sad. The woman who played the sister is currently taking a crash course in Spanish so she can appear in Mexican soap operas (which is the only place you can typically see that level of over-acting. Audrey Landers turned in a wonderful performance (as always).

The protagonist actually seems to be a decent actress. For her sake, I hope that this movie gets lost in a basement somewhere so she does not have to answer for it being in her filmography.

This could actually have been a rather good movie. The actors aren't half bad, and the movie "looks" good. But how the people react and what they do in this movie is just ridiculous. First, the main man, who is supposed to be the man of the house, very straightforward, very dominating, someone that everybody relies on, he just freezes or even cries when anything happens. Then they happily go on boat rides even when the bride-to-be has made it clear that she can't swim. And why not enter a sauna that has a lock on the outside of the door? Like most saunas do, right? Not. And allergy to coconut? Yes, we show the cabinet where all coconut of the house has been put. And the final nail in the coffin, for me, was when the bride-to-be and her sister sits on the edge of the boat by the dock to talk about the bad or strange things that have happened, and they don't even see the clearly floating corpse of the murdered ex-fiancee right below them. I mean, you couldn't miss her even in the corner of your eye. Sigh. No, this has to get 1/10 from me, even less if I could give it. How did they even get this thing published? Doesn't anybody question anything in the movie making business, or do they actually think that most people who will watch it are totally stupid. What a total waste of time and money.

When the EpiPen was found in the trash, nobody even questioned why it got there in the first place, doh, It was taken from her bag. The producers must think the public are really stupid.

Well I tried thinking it had to get better as let's face it, there's no way it could get worse. WRONG. Rubbish storyline, terrible acting etc etc. Another couple of hours of my life that I'll never get back. Avoid at all costs.

Borrowing some text from another reviewr.

As soon as the female protagonist reveals her coconut allergy, it is clear that this is going to be used to advance the plot. When her Epipen is found in the rubbish, no one really questions it.{ END }

So many of these thriller plots rely on a victim having A fatal reaction to one allergy or other. Yet the affected person keeps the antidote in their luggage, in their purse even a car. Why not on their person always at hand and less likely to be stolen ?

Am I the only one who finds this strange ?

Commenting on the story. The identity of the killer is telegraphed almost at the beginning of the film. So no surprise by the end