Through loss, love, and self-discovery, a woman transforms pain into art-and writes a life on her own terms.Through loss, love, and self-discovery, a woman transforms pain into art-and writes a life on her own terms.Through loss, love, and self-discovery, a woman transforms pain into art-and writes a life on her own terms.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 4 wins & 13 nominations total
Alexander Johnson
- Assistant Coach
- (as Alexander M. Johnson)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
6.5672
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Bold First Film
Kristen Stewart's directorial debut is a hard movie to watch, and that's what she intended. The Chronology of Water is unsettling and disturbing and succeeds at getting a reaction out of an audience. It's a movie that is purely based on emotion and lacks a central story or plot. It dives into dark themes without saying very much or having a message about the themes it's exploring. I can appreciate what Stewart was going for but I can't say I was particularly engaged. It definitely felt slow and dragged for me. There's some unique and cool editing and sound design. Overall there is actually a lot to like here, but it didn't entirely work for me. 6/10.
Very rich movie
I saw this movie a few hours ago and loved how it uses nearly every tool in the filmmaker's cookbook. It feels avant-garde at times-voice-over, bold sound choices, wild editing-yet remains immersive, emotional, and engaging. The layered story, taboo-breaking, shock-feminism, and economical dialogue are impressive; much is conveyed with very few words. The character focus is so strong you barely notice the lack of establishing shots. There's a brief section in a Ken Kesey-style writing workshop where there's less tension and things feel slightly more generic, but it still works well. Overall, it's a bold, beautiful film that looks very good too.
Experimental traumatic art
Beautifully shot and directed and portrayed. The zoom in made wonderful job to feel the depression and pain going through the character even although it has disturbing content. The flashbacks and diluted memories refers to the torturing experiences and scars didn't heal at all leading to annoying decisions and questioning behavior of broken confused spirits.
A trippy miss
There ended up being no Q&A because of unexpected travel issues, which was a bummer, I was looking forward to it. I'm a fan of Imogen Poots, and I was curious to see what Kristen Stewart would be like behind the camera. I kind of think of her in the same category as Jesse Eisenberg, actor whose directorial debuts interest me, and I thought her film would do the same.
This was actually my first time at the Angelika Theatre. The auditorium we were in was pretty small. The auditorium size didn't bother me, not the smallest I've been in, but the seats were a problem. I had to squeeze into them, and it was uncomfortable enough that I'll probably avoid screenings in that room if I can.
As for the movie itself, I found it unnecessarily experimental to its own detriment. Very trippy, very stylized. While it ambitiously tackles heavy themes like trauma, abuse, amorosity and addiction(felt like a project Stewart would naturally tackle), its trippy style felt overdone and poorly executed. The film dragged and often felt like it was trying really hard to appear bold or whatever but instead I found myself fighting boredom.
Maybe it lands better if you relate personally to the characters and what they're going through. The acting was alright but the filmmaking choices weren't for me. I never felt invested in the characters or her journey. The constant stylistic choices overshadowed the story, which could have been told better in a more straightforward manner. I didn't realize it was autobiographical going in, and the narrative choices made it a strange approach for a personal story.
I can imagine some people liking it, but I walked out with the same feeling I had after "I Saw the TV Glow(2024)". Totally different films, but they share that vibe of being gimmicky to me, trying to be more profound than they actually are, and in the end kinda boring.
This was actually my first time at the Angelika Theatre. The auditorium we were in was pretty small. The auditorium size didn't bother me, not the smallest I've been in, but the seats were a problem. I had to squeeze into them, and it was uncomfortable enough that I'll probably avoid screenings in that room if I can.
As for the movie itself, I found it unnecessarily experimental to its own detriment. Very trippy, very stylized. While it ambitiously tackles heavy themes like trauma, abuse, amorosity and addiction(felt like a project Stewart would naturally tackle), its trippy style felt overdone and poorly executed. The film dragged and often felt like it was trying really hard to appear bold or whatever but instead I found myself fighting boredom.
Maybe it lands better if you relate personally to the characters and what they're going through. The acting was alright but the filmmaking choices weren't for me. I never felt invested in the characters or her journey. The constant stylistic choices overshadowed the story, which could have been told better in a more straightforward manner. I didn't realize it was autobiographical going in, and the narrative choices made it a strange approach for a personal story.
I can imagine some people liking it, but I walked out with the same feeling I had after "I Saw the TV Glow(2024)". Totally different films, but they share that vibe of being gimmicky to me, trying to be more profound than they actually are, and in the end kinda boring.
Perfect as a short film
While the movies has jaw dropping cinematography, that seems to be the only quality it has. The plot is all over the place, and events are heavily disconnected. The movie tries to be shocking, but it does so in a poorly executed way. Instead integrating "heavy" topics into the plot itself, it just has random thrown in scenes, framed in a "everyone, look! We are talking about a heavy subject" way, which is truly a shame, as it makes it all seem too artificial.
Lastly, my biggest issue was the running time. This movie had no need for almost three hours. So many scenes could have been cut back. Additionally, I truly believe this would have been a masterpiece as a short film. Had it been 1.5h long, it would have better as a long-film even.
Lastly, my biggest issue was the running time. This movie had no need for almost three hours. So many scenes could have been cut back. Additionally, I truly believe this would have been a masterpiece as a short film. Had it been 1.5h long, it would have better as a long-film even.
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
The Big List of Fall Movies 2025
See a full list of all the movies coming to theaters this fall.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film is the directorial debut of academy nominated actress Kristen Stewart
- ConnectionsReferenced in Radio Dolin: Best Movies of the 2025 Cannes Film Festival (2025)
- How long will The Chronology of Water be?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $30,755
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $18,594
- Dec 7, 2025
- Gross worldwide
- $120,403
- Runtime
- 2h 8m(128 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content







