Doc's Stoned History

Does this humourless lecturing never stop? I guess in mad lefty world, the stoner inaccurate, judgemental history preachiness was funny? Poorly written and poorly acted, it comes across as a university skit to impress an Antifa-supporting college lecturer. Why did they ruin the show! The whole talking zombies thing was stupid as well. On the one hand they are preaching to the "evil" Republican humans to not be afraid of talking zombies, then they are all killed by said zombies, then the preachy Democrat leaders willfuly kill the same zombies or humans as much as they want. But, they are justified I guess, being our betters, and all. I like the show when it was fun. Not this hypocritical, political mess.

Okay. This has to be the slowest and trying to be funny when not funny at all. Humourless to say the least. Don't get me wrong some of it was okay. But its just not as good as used to be. Hoping the next episode is better

I missed the final season and a half due to travel overseas. So disappointed to see what this show became. Characters disappeared and then reappear episodes later, as if the writers didn't know what to do with them and maybe hoped we'd forget, then introduced characters out of the blue who supposedly have back stories with our main characters.

Honestly, this was the first episode I simply sped through to get to the next.

I usually enjoy the quirky zombie tv show, but this for me at least was the worst episode in the entire history of the show. The flashbacks to the founding fathers generating the constitution was terrible. I think in part it was meant to look silly, but unfortunately it came across as dumb, really really dumb. During the show they had about four cutscenes that went to shorts of the founding father's working on the constitution. It was about as good as dressing up four men from the street in high school drama class quality costumes and then filming them in a high school quality stage play...except worse. It was so bad that I actually had to change the channel. I don5 know which writer did this episode, maybe he was not having a good day or something, but it was terrible and should never have made it on tv.

Beyond that, the story in general for this season was straight up ridiculous. I expect a certain amo7nt of tha5 in this show that doesn't take itself too seriously, but this talking zombie theme for this season is ridiculous. By humanizing the zombies and having them talk such as they are in this season it humanisés them a lot and takes the terror and scare out of the zombies. The entire premise of man eating zombies is that they are scary and I still terror in the viewer. Feeding them cookies to make them human again destroys the entire theme.

I can tell that this season was written by a far left Democrat (which is ok) as they made George a woman with a mans name who is clearly gay the main protagonist of this season. While making a brand new never before seen actress your new show protagonist it makes me wonder why did they do this? Why take the spotlight off of our usual protagonists on the show to make a gay female named George all of a sudden the new star of the show! Someone who we don't even know!? It was a mistake. She/he (George) does a good enough job acting, it's just we don't know who this person is or why she is the new star!?

So I truly believe this entire season is a major mistake and that the show needs to get back to its roots. Back to when zombies on screen actually I still terror and horror and a real threat to what remains of humanity. The show never really took itself seriously, but it still was scary, it still had horror. Turn down the comedy a bit, fire some writers and go back to the drawing board please.