IMDb RATING
6.4/10
233
YOUR RATING
Intent on escaping her coastal bubble, Alexandra Pelosi sets out on a cross-country trip to engage in conversations with fellow Americans in an effort to gain an unfiltered understanding of ... Read allIntent on escaping her coastal bubble, Alexandra Pelosi sets out on a cross-country trip to engage in conversations with fellow Americans in an effort to gain an unfiltered understanding of other perspectives.Intent on escaping her coastal bubble, Alexandra Pelosi sets out on a cross-country trip to engage in conversations with fellow Americans in an effort to gain an unfiltered understanding of other perspectives.
Photos
Featured reviews
This doc made me sick. The director leverages her mother's position and screams at those she interviews. Super one sided. I am not a trumpian amd ca,e with a thirst for knowledge and was si ply put off. Gross.
I just happened to see this documentary on HBO, and I couldn't stop watching. We are more divided then ever and in my opinion i agree with the fact that if u dont agree with the liberals then right way ur prejudice or ur yelled at.. What individuals were saying throughout the documentary was true and real. I thought it was great that she took her kids to see the wall and I think where the yellow line was and the men crossed right in to our country was great insight to why we need a wall other countries have walls.. having a wall doesn't need to be looked at in a negative way. Why pay for man power to sit along the border when u can just have a wall. Good documentary
... either Alexandra Pelosi is the best actress in the history of the world, or she truly does get it and needs to have a long talk with mom (Nancy Pelosi) and see if any of it can rub off. She starts off by mentioning that she comes from a part of the world (San Francisco) where women protest Trump and his policies by dressing up as vaginas and marching. It is encouraging that she realizes the rest of the nation probably sees this as tragically weird.
In a single hour long documentary, Alexandra Pelosi decides to go "outside the bubble" of her coastal eite enclaves and talk with people who feel differently than she does about current events and politics, and see if she can see why these people feel the way that they do.
She went to Sutherland Springs, Tx where a gunman had killed 26 people inside a small church there to talk about gun violence and ask if the loss had changed their minds on the issue. She went to Alabama to ask folks how they reconcile voting for Roy Moore with their religious outlook. She went to Pennsylvania and West Virginia to talk to coal miners who had recently lost their jobs and ask if they felt betrayed by Trump. She went to Charlottesville to talk about the Confederate statues and racism. She went to Port Arthur to ask the folks there, hit hard by Hurricane Harvey, how they felt about global warming, And finally she went to the California/Mexico border to talk to people about the wall and illegal immigration.
I don't think she was condescending or belligerent at all. She would ask an initial question and just let the subjects talk. I think I can summarize that when it came to the religious questions, if you didn't have the viewpoint of the people interviewed you were just not going to get it. However, the folks in Appalachia and Port Arthur did give relatable arguments. It boiled down to - "What do we care about global warming if we have no jobs? Employed liberals can afford to talk about this, we are just trying to survive". I think Pelosi did get this, because she repeated it a couple of times.
In the closing segment on the border, it was really hard to argue the point with the young Trump supporter about the Antifa. Either Pelosi filmed, or he had filmed prior, encounters with the ironically named Antifa where he was merely counter protesting - he never laid a hand on them. And they repeatedly responded by hitting him with a club until finally he was bleeding from his mouth and the top of his head. How brave of the masked men in black.
Pelosi mentioned at several points where she disagreed with what many of the people believed, but she had to admit that she was never short on invitations to dinner from folks who didn't have that much to go around.
I'm knocking a single point off because she didn't go to the Midwest and interview in the Republican strongholds there. But maybe that is just too much for one short documentary. I'd strongly recommend this one.
In a single hour long documentary, Alexandra Pelosi decides to go "outside the bubble" of her coastal eite enclaves and talk with people who feel differently than she does about current events and politics, and see if she can see why these people feel the way that they do.
She went to Sutherland Springs, Tx where a gunman had killed 26 people inside a small church there to talk about gun violence and ask if the loss had changed their minds on the issue. She went to Alabama to ask folks how they reconcile voting for Roy Moore with their religious outlook. She went to Pennsylvania and West Virginia to talk to coal miners who had recently lost their jobs and ask if they felt betrayed by Trump. She went to Charlottesville to talk about the Confederate statues and racism. She went to Port Arthur to ask the folks there, hit hard by Hurricane Harvey, how they felt about global warming, And finally she went to the California/Mexico border to talk to people about the wall and illegal immigration.
I don't think she was condescending or belligerent at all. She would ask an initial question and just let the subjects talk. I think I can summarize that when it came to the religious questions, if you didn't have the viewpoint of the people interviewed you were just not going to get it. However, the folks in Appalachia and Port Arthur did give relatable arguments. It boiled down to - "What do we care about global warming if we have no jobs? Employed liberals can afford to talk about this, we are just trying to survive". I think Pelosi did get this, because she repeated it a couple of times.
In the closing segment on the border, it was really hard to argue the point with the young Trump supporter about the Antifa. Either Pelosi filmed, or he had filmed prior, encounters with the ironically named Antifa where he was merely counter protesting - he never laid a hand on them. And they repeatedly responded by hitting him with a club until finally he was bleeding from his mouth and the top of his head. How brave of the masked men in black.
Pelosi mentioned at several points where she disagreed with what many of the people believed, but she had to admit that she was never short on invitations to dinner from folks who didn't have that much to go around.
I'm knocking a single point off because she didn't go to the Midwest and interview in the Republican strongholds there. But maybe that is just too much for one short documentary. I'd strongly recommend this one.
Strange how Pelosi only gets love/hate reviews - obviously some people can't watch without judging her by her last name. This is a perfect example of how people view everything from their own perspective. I would encourage everyone to watch this. Insightful.
The general premise of stepping outside the leftist bubble and hearing from Trump supporters with obviously different lives and viewpoints could've been a fantastic documentary series/film. However, the way this particular example was executed was, well, horrible. Nearly every interview seemed to kick off with Pelosi being annoyed and yelling at them, then there was the editing. I get that there was probably a lot to try and fit into a one hour slot, but it came across as though it was Pelosi basically mocking their ways of life. Rather than hearing a true discussion as to what they believe and why, she was being belligerent towards them and seemed to only use footage of them that intended on portraying the subjects as dumb, poor, rednecks. Then, there was the whole "Nancy Pelosi's grandchildren" thing. I just don't understand the point of that other than for her to say, "Hey, I'm Nancy Pelosi's daughter and here are her real grandchildren" in a gotcha kind of moment that made no sense.
This should be a series, with each hour long episode covering a different topic, led by a more level-headed, rational, interviewer who can carry on a calm discussion with someone, rather than a belligerent, judgmental, short sighted interviewer. And it should be edited in such a way to give us more of a full picture of what they believe and why.
TL;DR - This felt like an arrogant leftists elite putting down, and putting on display, people she thinks are lesser than her. Much like the old freak shows/side shows/circus shows used to do. 2 stars for the premise, no additional stars for actual content/execution.
**I say all this as a liberal who is in full support of open dialogue**
This should be a series, with each hour long episode covering a different topic, led by a more level-headed, rational, interviewer who can carry on a calm discussion with someone, rather than a belligerent, judgmental, short sighted interviewer. And it should be edited in such a way to give us more of a full picture of what they believe and why.
TL;DR - This felt like an arrogant leftists elite putting down, and putting on display, people she thinks are lesser than her. Much like the old freak shows/side shows/circus shows used to do. 2 stars for the premise, no additional stars for actual content/execution.
**I say all this as a liberal who is in full support of open dialogue**
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- 走出同溫層
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h(60 min)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content