IMDb RATING
6.3/10
5.9K
YOUR RATING
In 1926, with her personal life in tatters and her writing in crisis, a young Agatha Christie decides to solve a real-life murder.In 1926, with her personal life in tatters and her writing in crisis, a young Agatha Christie decides to solve a real-life murder.In 1926, with her personal life in tatters and her writing in crisis, a young Agatha Christie decides to solve a real-life murder.
Amelia Dell
- Rosalind
- (as Amelia Rose Dell)
Josh Silver
- Franklin
- (as Joshua Silver)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Kind of funny how the Agatha Christie character says she has a problem of making the most unlikely character(s) the murderer(s) in her novels but her readers manage to figure out who it is a few pages in; I picked off who the culprit/culprits was/were in pretty early on (and it's not because I'm particularly clever).
Simply put, the actors are great, sets and costumes are great, story is a little too... er... simple. Entertaining and worth watching, just don't expect a head-scratcher.
Simply put, the actors are great, sets and costumes are great, story is a little too... er... simple. Entertaining and worth watching, just don't expect a head-scratcher.
For a made for Tv drama this was very good. understated, simple, but well executed.
I never would have guessed the whole plot, but perhaps I enjoyed it more because I really wasn't expecting much!?
When I heard the premise, and heard that it wasn't endorsed by Agatha Christie's family, or indeed the estate, I feared the worst, so in truth I watched it with exceedingly low expectations, and is so often the case, I really enjoyed it. I thought the plot, direction, acting, and general vibe were all terrific.
The last time I watched something which tried to explain away Agatha's disappearance it involved The Doctor, Catherine Tate, and a giant wasp, this proposed a slightly more Earthly solution, but was equally as entertaining and witty.
Great acting, I loved Ruth Bradley's interpretation of the great writer, Samantha Spiro and Pippa Haywood were excellent also.
Bravo to those involved, a great Agatha Christie fix, ahead of The ABC Murders.
9/10
The last time I watched something which tried to explain away Agatha's disappearance it involved The Doctor, Catherine Tate, and a giant wasp, this proposed a slightly more Earthly solution, but was equally as entertaining and witty.
Great acting, I loved Ruth Bradley's interpretation of the great writer, Samantha Spiro and Pippa Haywood were excellent also.
Bravo to those involved, a great Agatha Christie fix, ahead of The ABC Murders.
9/10
This was a very enjoyable and engrossing drama that was much better than I had anticipated. The characters were well defined and well acted, the story was engrossing (if a little far-fetched), and the production quality was top-notch. Ruth Bradley was extremely engaging as Agatha Christie and it was lovely to see Pippa Haywood on our screens again. Yeah, it was good!
This is a fictionalized account of prominent novelist Agatha Christie's 11-day disappearance back in 1926. Evidently, Christie never revealed where she was or what she was doing during that time; the writers of this film imagined what it would be like if Christie went off and solved an actual murder.
Christie is approached at her home by a retired nurse who wants Christie to solve her lover's murder. The murder happened several years ago, but the trail went cold, so the police gave up and moved on to something else. Christie eventually agrees to help, disguises herself as a law-firm secretary, and formulates an imaginary will-reading at an old house, that names each of the nurse's murder suspects as heirs.
Another murder does occur (as is generally the pattern of these things), and it's a race against time to discover who the true killer is before they strike again. I enjoyed the overall feeling of this film. I am a huge Agatha Christie fan, and I like to watch film adaptations either about her, or about her books. I solved almost all of the murder by myself (for once) and was immensely proud.
Christie is approached at her home by a retired nurse who wants Christie to solve her lover's murder. The murder happened several years ago, but the trail went cold, so the police gave up and moved on to something else. Christie eventually agrees to help, disguises herself as a law-firm secretary, and formulates an imaginary will-reading at an old house, that names each of the nurse's murder suspects as heirs.
Another murder does occur (as is generally the pattern of these things), and it's a race against time to discover who the true killer is before they strike again. I enjoyed the overall feeling of this film. I am a huge Agatha Christie fan, and I like to watch film adaptations either about her, or about her books. I solved almost all of the murder by myself (for once) and was immensely proud.
Did you know
- TriviaAgatha uses the under cover name of Mary Westmacott in the drama. The real Agatha Christie published 6 novels under this name between 1930 and 1956: The Rose and the Yew Tree, the Burden, Absent in the Spring, Giant's Bread, Unfinished Portrait and a Daughter's Daughter.
- GoofsThe neck-tie (dark with stripes) that Agatha wears as the legal assistant changes several times during a single scene. The knot may or may present a stripe.
- Quotes
Agatha Christie: What if Sherlock Holmes had never existed?
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle: Good riddance to an intolerable dick.
- Crazy creditsDisclaimer in end credits: "This film has not been endorsed, licensed or authorised by the estate of Agatha Christie or by Agatha Christie Limited."
- ConnectionsFollowed by Agatha and the Curse of Ishtar (2019)
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $77,542
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content