Hunt and the IMF pursue a dangerous AI called the Entity that's infiltrated global intelligence. With governments and a figure from his past in pursuit, Hunt races to stop it from forever ch... Read allHunt and the IMF pursue a dangerous AI called the Entity that's infiltrated global intelligence. With governments and a figure from his past in pursuit, Hunt races to stop it from forever changing the world.Hunt and the IMF pursue a dangerous AI called the Entity that's infiltrated global intelligence. With governments and a figure from his past in pursuit, Hunt races to stop it from forever changing the world.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 10 wins & 16 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
7.2191K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Summary
Reviewers say 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning' is noteworthy for its spectacular stunts and action sequences, particularly Tom Cruise's death-defying performances in the underwater and airplane scenes. However, many reviewers criticize the film for its pacing, over-reliance on exposition, and lack of a compelling plot. The character development and emotional depth are often seen as lacking, with some reviewers feeling the film prioritizes spectacle over story. Despite these criticisms, the film is generally considered entertaining, with the high-octane action and Cruise's performance being the main draws.
Featured reviews
"Thank you.. for bringing me back"
It was quite clear this film had lofty ambitions since the previous entry.
And considering what it is, what came before it and the legacy it was meant to conclude.. I was expecting to be wowed! Not bored at the start, anxious for something to happen in the middle, and losing all hope to at least be surprised by the end.
It is almost 3 hours long, and the little that does happen, is buried between too much nothing. Awful pacing, dull and meanders dialogue that often goes nowhere nor builds-up to something, a completely dull villain and threat. And worse of all.. what is the point in a movie that constantly tells you exactly how it is going to go? And by virtue of being what it is, there is absolutely no mystery about its conclusion. Not playing with a viewer's expectation is NOT a requirement in storytelling.. but you have to give them something! A bit of tension and intrigue.
It's a shame because I can see what it wanted to achieve with its premise, but it feels stuck in the past while trying to use more modern tropes.
Still, it is entertaining enough, and provides spectacle-scenes so incredible anyone would be hard pressed to replicate them in such quality. The cast is okay, the locations good, great production, visuals and cinematography.
But a film has to be more than a few set pieces and scenes.. it has to work as a whole and be more than the sum of its parts.
It's a fact that not all previous entries have been stellar. So I'm somewhat sad this is how M. I. "ends".
And considering what it is, what came before it and the legacy it was meant to conclude.. I was expecting to be wowed! Not bored at the start, anxious for something to happen in the middle, and losing all hope to at least be surprised by the end.
It is almost 3 hours long, and the little that does happen, is buried between too much nothing. Awful pacing, dull and meanders dialogue that often goes nowhere nor builds-up to something, a completely dull villain and threat. And worse of all.. what is the point in a movie that constantly tells you exactly how it is going to go? And by virtue of being what it is, there is absolutely no mystery about its conclusion. Not playing with a viewer's expectation is NOT a requirement in storytelling.. but you have to give them something! A bit of tension and intrigue.
It's a shame because I can see what it wanted to achieve with its premise, but it feels stuck in the past while trying to use more modern tropes.
Still, it is entertaining enough, and provides spectacle-scenes so incredible anyone would be hard pressed to replicate them in such quality. The cast is okay, the locations good, great production, visuals and cinematography.
But a film has to be more than a few set pieces and scenes.. it has to work as a whole and be more than the sum of its parts.
It's a fact that not all previous entries have been stellar. So I'm somewhat sad this is how M. I. "ends".
1 hour less would have made Final Reckoning so much better
As both parts of the final film in the Mission Impossible franchise were shot back to back, I can't understand the marketing decision to release the 2 chapters 2 years apart. Having said that, the opening- again - was a masterpiece: fast, entertaining, suspenseful. What followed thereafter was 1 hour too long. They just stretched the final action scene endlessly and the White House/ Pentagon scenes were too pompous and too long. One could have made the film so much better and more entertaining by cutting A LOT of scenes. However the movie was still fun, but by far not the best of the series. All actors were excellent, the action scenes were the stars, as usual. Unfortunately many dialogues sounded like the were written by "the entity" aka KI.
A great ending?
This movie successfully concluded this 30-year-old franchise. The action was superb but not over-the-top. There are a lot of characters from the past that being brought back naturally, which I feel is a nice touch. It serves their purpose and doesn't feel out of place or forced. However, not all are to my liking - the twist wasn't as impressive as previous movies and the plot felt a bit linear and thin. It's almost 3 hours so I feels like a road trip rather than a roller coaster. Despite this, I enjoyed the ride and it reminded me of what MI is really about: "We live and die in the shadows, for those we hold close, and those we never meet."
How can a 3-hour movie have so many plot holes?
It should be titled "Missing" Impossible. Everything you love about the MI franchise is gone. If you are expecting an espionage thriller, there are 7 other Mission Impossible movies for that. It isn't this. The story is convoluted and doesn't make sense. The editing is so choppy and doesn't feel cohesive. Taking place less than 2 months after the last movie, so much has changed that is never explained. How is so-and-so president all of a sudden when they weren't 2 months prior? How did that other character get into the state they are in? No explanation. The franchise should have ended with the last movie. This felt like it was all about Tom Cruise trying to prove to himself and others that he can still do this. What a disappointment!
Lame
Lamest movie in the series, if not ever! I unfortunately spent money in the theatre to watch this so waste of time as well as money! I don't even want to waste any more words writing this review but unfortunately cannot post this until and unless it contains three hundred words so to sum up... Lamest movie ever!
Most Popular Movies of 2025: #9 Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning
Discover the most popular movies, series, and stars on IMDb in 2025
Did you know
- TriviaThe date that President Sloane sends to Admiral Neely, implying vast importance in the characters' lives, is May 22, 1996. This is also the release date of Mission: Impossible (1996).
- GoofsAs the lights go back on around the world, it is simultaneously nighttime in both the eastern and western hemispheres.
- Quotes
Luther Stickell: Our lives are not defined by any one action. Our lives are the sum of our choices
- Crazy credits[Netherlands theatrical viewing] Even before the first production/distribution company logos appear on-screen, the movie starts with a personal welcoming word by Tom Cruise himself, briefly mentioning the effort they put in making this movie and wishing the audience a happy viewing.
- ConnectionsFeatured in The Project: Episode dated 16 May 2025 (2025)
- SoundtracksMission: Impossible Theme
Written by Lalo Schifrin
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Also known as
- Misión imposible: Sentencia Final
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $400,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $197,413,515
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $64,036,428
- May 25, 2025
- Gross worldwide
- $598,767,057
- Runtime
- 2h 49m(169 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content




