moosish-628-965954
Joined Mar 2013
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings98
moosish-628-965954's rating
Reviews12
moosish-628-965954's rating
My title for this review says it all. The script was predictable and sophomoric, more like a high school play. The make-up and hair-dos were perfect for 1969, instead of the silent film era. Dick Van Dyke does the most with what's there, but even his (and Carl Reiner's) gigantic talents couldn't save this spoonful of nothingness.
What a waste of talent! So many familiar, capable actors in an embarrassingly bad movie! Is it trying to make a statement about slavery and racial exploitation? A little, here and there. But if that's the point, it's lost in a nonsensical plot with trite dialogue and stereotypical characters. The most glaring issue (besides the plot, with many scenes making no LOGICAL, temporal sense) is the clearly 1950s dress styles masquerading as antebellum fashions, but with hoop skirts. The other production values are fine -- typical mid-50s stuff. The music score from the master (Max Steiner) is fine, but again, it's lost behind the senselessness of the plot. It's always fun to see movie stars in their earliest roles, but even the fun of seeing young Sidney Poitier, or the pre-Lily Munster Yvonne De Carlo, or the late-in-career Clark Gable, isn't worth having to watch the rest of this stupid attempt to make a meaningful statement about race and values in the antebellum South.