nalcacimurat
Joined Sep 2013
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings103
nalcacimurat's rating
Reviews5
nalcacimurat's rating
It is bad, yes. The actors and actresses do a poor job, but the real problem lies with the script. I doubt they used ChatGPT to write the dialogues; they are very poorly written and lack any depth. The actors seem inexperienced with green screen technology; they often look like they are staring into emptiness rather than interacting with their environment. This disconnect makes it difficult to engage with the characters and the story.
Speaking of the story, the main plot is also weak. It fails to capture the excitement and complexity of the Star Wars universe. They did not include the common Star Wars characters, robots, and species that fans love, which was a major letdown. The absence of these iconic elements made the film feel disconnected from the beloved franchise.
However, I do have to mention that I like Kate Anna Moss, and the character Sole isn't that bad either. These small positives are the only reason I gave it 2 stars.
Speaking of the story, the main plot is also weak. It fails to capture the excitement and complexity of the Star Wars universe. They did not include the common Star Wars characters, robots, and species that fans love, which was a major letdown. The absence of these iconic elements made the film feel disconnected from the beloved franchise.
However, I do have to mention that I like Kate Anna Moss, and the character Sole isn't that bad either. These small positives are the only reason I gave it 2 stars.
"I saw Derinkuyu when I was 14 years old. Since then, the idea of cylindrical doors has kept me curious. They are a brilliant idea, but is it enough to keep invaders out? I doubt it.
So he has a different idea.
At 14 years old, I had to bend down to pass through the tunnels. I don't think anyone would live there unless they were hiding from something very dangerous.
Mainstream media is what we see evidence of every day. They tell you the story in a way that fits their main story. So, there is mainstream history and archaeological narrative.
Aren't we all curious about why ancient people were so obsessed with astrology, stars, and beyond? He has an idea about that.
And of course, serpents are everywhere. There are tons of myths and ancient stories about serpents. And he has an idea why.
Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse challenges the mainstream archaeological narrative.
He is brilliant.
So he has a different idea.
At 14 years old, I had to bend down to pass through the tunnels. I don't think anyone would live there unless they were hiding from something very dangerous.
Mainstream media is what we see evidence of every day. They tell you the story in a way that fits their main story. So, there is mainstream history and archaeological narrative.
Aren't we all curious about why ancient people were so obsessed with astrology, stars, and beyond? He has an idea about that.
And of course, serpents are everywhere. There are tons of myths and ancient stories about serpents. And he has an idea why.
Graham Hancock's Ancient Apocalypse challenges the mainstream archaeological narrative.
He is brilliant.