ozguryilmaz955

This is, by far, the best series I have ever watched in theStar Trek franchise. Politically, I don't think there's anything wrong with it-in fact, it does an excellent job of representing multiculturalism. On top of that, it's technically and cinematographically very well-made. Even though I may not grasp every single detail, I can confidently say that the animations and visual effects are quite impressive. What sets this series apart from other Star Trek installments is its strong sense of narrative cohesion. The way it handles time, space, and quantum physics-along with other intricate details-is remarkably well-executed. However, this relentless pursuit of excellence, along with its commitment to political correctness, can sometimes make the show feel a bit tedious. This was particularly noticeable in the finale.

Speaking of the ending, it leaves the audience hopeful for the future, which is a positive note to conclude on. That said, it also carries a somewhat didactic tone, as if it's trying to deliver a moral lesson rather than just telling a compelling story. While the intention is noble, this approach can occasionally come across as heavy-handed. One of the standout aspects of this series is its commitment to diversity. Unlike some older Star Trek iterations, which, while progressive for their time, still had limitations, this show embraces a wide range of cultures, identities, and perspectives. The characters feel authentic, and their backgrounds are woven naturally into the plot rather than feeling forced. From stunning visual effects to seamless animation, the production quality is top-notch. The attention to detail in ship designs, alien worlds, and futuristic technology is impressive. Even if some of the more complex scientific concepts go over my head, the visuals alone make it an engaging watch. Many Star Trek series have struggled with maintaining a consistent storyline across episodes, often resorting to standalone adventures. This series, however, manages to balance episodic storytelling with an overarching plot. The integration of time travel, alternate dimensions, and quantum mechanics is handled with care, making the universe feel expansive yet coherent.

While the show's progressive values are commendable, there are moments when the messaging overshadows the storytelling. Some dialogues and plot points feel less like organic character interactions and more like deliberate attempts to check off inclusivity boxes. This isn't inherently bad, but when overdone, it can detract from immersion. The ending, while optimistic, carries a strong "lesson-learning" vibe. Star Trek has always been a platform for social commentary, but the best episodes deliver those messages subtly. Here, the finale leans a bit too much into overt moralizing, which might not resonate with viewers who prefer storytelling to take precedence over preaching. Despite these minor criticisms, the series remains a standout entry in the Star Trek franchise. Its strengths-diverse representation, high production value, and a well-structured narrative-far outweigh its flaws. If future seasons can balance their ethical messaging with more nuanced storytelling, this could easily become one of the most beloved Star Trek series of all time. The finale leaves room for exciting possibilities, and I'm genuinely looking forward to where the story goes next. Here's hoping that the next chapters focus just as much on gripping storytelling as they do on delivering important social messages.

I thought I had watched all the works about the Spanish Civil War. But this suddenly came across me. An incredible documentary from 1963. It puts today's so-called documentaries to shame. I saw images about the civil war that I had never seen before. For example, I had read a lot about the burning of churches, but I saw it here in detail for the first time. I deducted one point. The reason for that was that the images of death were displayed in a somewhat pornographic way. If it were a documentary from today, I would have deducted more points, but a work should be judged according to its period. When we judge this work according to its period, I think that the discussions on ethics were not as advanced at that time. Apart from that, you can find the answer to the question of how a documentary should be in this work...

A great movie that shows that human history is not always full of evil events. It explains the importance of solidarity in a great way. It is incredibly positive. I also congratulate you on the production. You did not make it speak in English like in classic productions, you adapted the concept of language. It does not seem artificial at all. The setting, the plot, the flow of time. It is a beautiful example that what we call friendship is not only between two people. I could not stop praising the movie. Also, its low score made me question what kind of movies people like once again. I only deducted 1 point because the animation was laggy in places.