anirudhagupta01
Joined Jun 2014
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges5
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews30
anirudhagupta01's rating
I have never seen a Salman Khan movie that demonstrates any real logic, depth, or cinematic quality. The storylines in his films often feel disjointed, lacking coherence or meaningful development, and there is rarely any genuine attempt at delivering a thoughtful message or showcasing strong filmmaking skills.
When it comes to his fanbase, it's quite apparent that a large portion of Salman's viewers fall into the "chapri" category-a term often used to describe people with flashy, attention-seeking behavior and little regard for substance. These viewers seem to prioritize stardom and superficial entertainment over narratives that require critical thinking or offer quality content. As a result, both the movies and the audience seem to operate on a similar, logic-deficient wavelength.
From start to finish, these films unapologetically indulge in over-the-top antics, ignoring even the most basic expectations of good cinema. It's especially ironic that a star associated with the "Being Human" brand consistently releases movies that feel so devoid of humanity, empathy, or any redeeming social value. At times, calling these productions "films" feels too generous-perhaps "tatti" is a more fitting description for what is often delivered in the name of entertainment.
When it comes to his fanbase, it's quite apparent that a large portion of Salman's viewers fall into the "chapri" category-a term often used to describe people with flashy, attention-seeking behavior and little regard for substance. These viewers seem to prioritize stardom and superficial entertainment over narratives that require critical thinking or offer quality content. As a result, both the movies and the audience seem to operate on a similar, logic-deficient wavelength.
From start to finish, these films unapologetically indulge in over-the-top antics, ignoring even the most basic expectations of good cinema. It's especially ironic that a star associated with the "Being Human" brand consistently releases movies that feel so devoid of humanity, empathy, or any redeeming social value. At times, calling these productions "films" feels too generous-perhaps "tatti" is a more fitting description for what is often delivered in the name of entertainment.
The movie has good story, at-least not this 4.4 if casting was done properly.
Arjun was not fit for the role, only reason I director choosing Arjun are either nepotism or lobbying.
I would suggest thing were better if Ayushmaan or karthik aryan has choosen for the role.
The story has lot of flaws. Like when actress is pregnant, she goes to cover news in public where running around could happen. In real life no anchor been sent if their health cases is like this.
Since the story is too much face showing of Arjun, it's not done properly. Neither the movie was good neither arjun got anything good from the movie.
Arjun was not fit for the role, only reason I director choosing Arjun are either nepotism or lobbying.
I would suggest thing were better if Ayushmaan or karthik aryan has choosen for the role.
The story has lot of flaws. Like when actress is pregnant, she goes to cover news in public where running around could happen. In real life no anchor been sent if their health cases is like this.
Since the story is too much face showing of Arjun, it's not done properly. Neither the movie was good neither arjun got anything good from the movie.
