gypseykitten-43-511218
Joined Jul 2014
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
gypseykitten-43-511218's rating
The movie isn't in the same category as the others. The others are definitely horror with some fear involved (ok Ring 2 is less scary than the first one). Rings, while it has some false jump scares, wasn't scary, but it made me tense and kept my attention. Many, if not most, know the basic story, watch a video, and something will happen to you. Rings keeps the basic story, but I think it adds something extra.
I'm glad I saw it, and it will end up in my collection, but not until the price goes down.
I'm glad I saw it, and it will end up in my collection, but not until the price goes down.
I watch a lot of disaster movies, and while I wouldn't place this with the Towering Inferno or The Poseidon Adventure, I enjoyed this a lot. I was surprised it was a TV movie because the acting was so good. They spent enough time for character development. There were several subplots, but that is true for many many disaster movies. I got this movie as part of a collection and some of the movies were really bad. This one was worth at least twice what I paid for the set. I will be watching this movie at least 3 times a year and definitely will recommend it to anyone who likes this kind of film. This movie was well worth my time. I was shocked that the only other review was really bad.
