zeljkoni2000
Joined Oct 2014
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings43
zeljkoni2000's rating
Reviews26
zeljkoni2000's rating
This is like some kind of continuation of the trend we see in many movies made after 2007, where they show in bad light either black girls or white boys.
The same trend you see in music videos and various series. Black girls are somehow always shown as bad. But not black men, only black girls. And same goes for white boys. It's hard to believe that's all just a coincidence that accidentally spread in so many series, especially those for young people.
Biased shows like this should be banned. Black girls are NOT bad. White boys are NOT bad. So, why is this artificial cliche constantly being pushed, since approximately 2007 ??
The same trend you see in music videos and various series. Black girls are somehow always shown as bad. But not black men, only black girls. And same goes for white boys. It's hard to believe that's all just a coincidence that accidentally spread in so many series, especially those for young people.
Biased shows like this should be banned. Black girls are NOT bad. White boys are NOT bad. So, why is this artificial cliche constantly being pushed, since approximately 2007 ??
I really didn't expect much. It was a pleasant surprise. Can't understand how a movie like this gets rating of 5.8, while movies much worse than this get a higher rating?
Everyone who wrote more than two sentences gave it a good rating. So, the only conclusion is that bad ratings were made by some software automation that cannot make text look like human wrote it.
Good ratings were made by humans. Bad ratings by software bots. Someone really hates good movies that aren't completely politically correct.
Everyone who wrote more than two sentences gave it a good rating. So, the only conclusion is that bad ratings were made by some software automation that cannot make text look like human wrote it.
Good ratings were made by humans. Bad ratings by software bots. Someone really hates good movies that aren't completely politically correct.
A movie that is trying to show suffering of territory occupied by the terrorists. One of many propaganda movies defending ISIL terrorist, without actually mentioning their names.
What a true journalist would say is that terrorists occupied a city and forced citizens to fight against their own government, which of course resulted in the government bombing the terrorists and citizens which were now fighting along with the terrorists.
But truthful journalists wouldn't even be sent to Syria, because truth was the victim, rather than the goal of this expedition.
What a true journalist would say is that terrorists occupied a city and forced citizens to fight against their own government, which of course resulted in the government bombing the terrorists and citizens which were now fighting along with the terrorists.
But truthful journalists wouldn't even be sent to Syria, because truth was the victim, rather than the goal of this expedition.