rkjensen
Joined Oct 2014
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
rkjensen's rating
Quite frankly, what made the previous two in this series good was the long, lengthy "sex" scenes. And the copious nudity of the hot girl. This one is nothing like that. It's basically just revenge against men, without the sex. This movie sucks.
Quite frankly, what made the previous two in this series good was the long, lengthy "sex" scenes. And the copious nudity of the hot girl. This one is nothing like that. It's basically just revenge against men, without the sex. This movie sucks.
Quite frankly, what made the previous two in this series good was the long, lengthy "sex" scenes. And the copious nudity of the hot girl. This one is nothing like that. It's basically just revenge against men, without the sex. This movie sucks.
Quite frankly, what made the previous two in this series good was the long, lengthy "sex" scenes. And the copious nudity of the hot girl. This one is nothing like that. It's basically just revenge against men, without the sex. This movie sucks.
Quite frankly, what made the previous two in this series good was the long, lengthy "sex" scenes. And the copious nudity of the hot girl. This one is nothing like that. It's basically just revenge against men, without the sex. This movie sucks.
I was in high school. Most of this film was filmed at Southwestern College in Chula Vista CA.
They allowed dozens of local people to be unpaid extras in scenes where they needed running scared people. Our only pay was one free meal from the catering truck. I got David McCallums autograph.
They allowed dozens of local people to be unpaid extras in scenes where they needed running scared people. Our only pay was one free meal from the catering truck. I got David McCallums autograph.
A tedious and boring display of maudlin over-sentimentality. Hollywood hasn't a clue these day how to make good dramas and this is another example of that.