AziziOthmanMY
Joined Feb 2015
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings1.6K
AziziOthmanMY's rating
Reviews248
AziziOthmanMY's rating
Alien: Earth is an absolute triumph! The cast looks fantastic, perfectly embodying their roles and bringing a fresh yet familiar energy to the story. The production team has done an incredible job staying faithful to the original, capturing the iconic atmosphere and tension that made the first film legendary. Every detail, from the set design to the pacing, feels carefully crafted to honor the franchise while offering something new for both longtime fans and newcomers alike. A must-watch for anyone who loves sci-fi done right!
Action & Technical Prowess: The choreography is crisp and purposeful, delivering scenes where every punch and takedown carries weight-far from the frenetic "cut-cut-zoom" style often seen elsewhere
Visual Flair: The film boasts a moody, neo-noir aesthetic. Its nighttime cinematography is both atmospheric and sharp, lending the movie a polished, cinematic feel
Strong Performances: Sharnaaz Ahmad (Ghaz) shines with a tormented, slow-burning portrayal of betrayal and inner conflict Fathom Magazine
Amelia Henderson's limited screen time is wielded strategically-each appearance is emotionally resonant
Where It Falls Short: Familiar Story Beats: The narrative of framed betrayal and estranged siblings, while emotionally charged, treads well-worn ground and lacks fresh twists
Character Motivation Gaps: Ghaz's rapid conviction of Ariff's betrayal feels narratively convenient, undercutting the depth of their brotherhood and reducing emotional impact
Overused Camera Technique: Despite generally strong direction, the frequent use of fast whip pans becomes visually tiring and somewhat distracting.
Visual Flair: The film boasts a moody, neo-noir aesthetic. Its nighttime cinematography is both atmospheric and sharp, lending the movie a polished, cinematic feel
Strong Performances: Sharnaaz Ahmad (Ghaz) shines with a tormented, slow-burning portrayal of betrayal and inner conflict Fathom Magazine
Amelia Henderson's limited screen time is wielded strategically-each appearance is emotionally resonant
Where It Falls Short: Familiar Story Beats: The narrative of framed betrayal and estranged siblings, while emotionally charged, treads well-worn ground and lacks fresh twists
Character Motivation Gaps: Ghaz's rapid conviction of Ariff's betrayal feels narratively convenient, undercutting the depth of their brotherhood and reducing emotional impact
Overused Camera Technique: Despite generally strong direction, the frequent use of fast whip pans becomes visually tiring and somewhat distracting.
War of the Worlds (2025) is not a movie-it's a desperate, soulless social media experiment masquerading as cinema. Rather than telling a story through compelling characters, masterful cinematography, or immersive world-building, this "film" stitches together TikTok clips, livestream reactions, and influencer skits in what can only be described as a dumpster fire of creative laziness.
Instead of modernizing H. G. Wells' classic tale with vision and artistic ambition, the filmmakers opted for the cheapest gimmick: turning alien invasion into an endless scroll of shaky phone videos and cringe-worthy "viral" moments. This isn't innovative; it's a cop-out. It feels like a corporate brainstorm where someone said, "What if we made a movie for Gen Z... but didn't actually make a movie?"
The result is hollow, exhausting, and insulting to the intelligence of anyone who values cinema as an art form. War of the Worlds deserves better than being reduced to a glorified Instagram reel. Calling this "creative" is like calling spam emails "literature."
In short: a symbol of everything wrong with modern filmmaking-algorithm-chasing, authenticity-dead, and completely devoid of genuine storytelling.
Instead of modernizing H. G. Wells' classic tale with vision and artistic ambition, the filmmakers opted for the cheapest gimmick: turning alien invasion into an endless scroll of shaky phone videos and cringe-worthy "viral" moments. This isn't innovative; it's a cop-out. It feels like a corporate brainstorm where someone said, "What if we made a movie for Gen Z... but didn't actually make a movie?"
The result is hollow, exhausting, and insulting to the intelligence of anyone who values cinema as an art form. War of the Worlds deserves better than being reduced to a glorified Instagram reel. Calling this "creative" is like calling spam emails "literature."
In short: a symbol of everything wrong with modern filmmaking-algorithm-chasing, authenticity-dead, and completely devoid of genuine storytelling.