fil-nik09

I will start by saying that I expected a lot worse. But like REALLY REALLY a lot worse, but it was not. Aside from nudity, there were no other 'issues' with the film despite eating human feces, violence, rape and other terrible things.

Why?

Because everything is done so amatherish that I start to view the film as a bad comedy or a parody.

Let's first start with big, fake male members on boys! Like, what the hell was happening with that!?!????? It was silly. Laughable. Then all those scenes with human escrements... Man, they could not even make it look like a human feces???!!! That was obviously a cake. Or something - nutela (first version)???

Then story telling by those women. It was absurd. But in comical way. Or even pitty bad acting!? And the ending!!!! What's your girls name? Marcella or something. Two boys dancing at the end? Like what was that and why was that the end?

All in all, I can see an 'artsy' side to it. As I am an artist I recognized works by Fernand Leger, then italian futurist movement and similar. Cubist paintings and drawings. Some scenes were really artsy and enteriors are strange, but sometimes beautiful.

In the end, only that 'president' guy was disturbing because he was really ugly. But I guess he stands in the opposition to all those beautiful boys.

5+ from me. It is interesting in a way, but it is rather amaterish and silly.

I just saw the film and I really loved it.

I remember that the book (which I read a long time ago - maybe some 10 years ago or something) was really funny and I enjoyed it so much that I had to buy it. However, I do not remember the end of the book, but I am 101% sure it was not like in the movie.

Anyway, I liked the setting. Everything religious is very appealing to me, though I am not religious myself.

The acting is great. The pace of the film is just how it is supposed to be. Very artistic. Maybe they should have just filmed more scenes of the Sistine chapel. But maybe it was not filmed in the real one.

All in all, I recommend both the book and the film!

Nine from me.

Well, the first thing after I finished the movie was to see who was this architect and surprise, surprise, surprise ... He never existed and this was not after a true story or something. So, for that reason alone, I have to guve it to the ones who made this film... It made it to be very believable that it is based after a real artist, like it was Van Gogh or Renoir or Rothko or Gaudi... Although it is over 3 hours, I did not feel it as if it was that long. So that is a plus. I think the acting was good, but Lazlo's wife was overdramatic sometimes and that was not really belieavable. But the most 'off' scene was that rape scene. That was so not true to life and I was surprised they actually left it!!! And I will not get into the details.

All in all, 8 from me. I really liked the artistic vibe of the film.