paronensamu
Joined Mar 2015
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews1
paronensamu's rating
I've never written a review before, but these "documentaries" made me so frustrated that I had to.
The biggest problem is the man himself. I'm not at all familiar with Morgan or his work, but I had the imperssion he was - at least to some degree - a distinguished journalist. After watching three episodes I was dumbfounded.
Piers must be the worst interviewer I've come across, ever. There's no objectivity. There's no dialogue. He's so strongly biased that it hurts to watch. Basically he keeps blaming the interviewee again and again. Same argument again and again. He doesn't listen a word he's told, he interrupts constantly and keeps coming back to the start. He keeps getting called up on his BS by all these guys but he just keeps at it until the accused is fed up and leaves. And every episode was exactly the same!
This abomination of a documentary does not: -Bring up any new information or evidence -Prove anyone quilty or innocent -Have _ANY_ information value
What it does: -Sets a textbook example of a worst case scenario interview.
How and why was this ever realeased?
The biggest problem is the man himself. I'm not at all familiar with Morgan or his work, but I had the imperssion he was - at least to some degree - a distinguished journalist. After watching three episodes I was dumbfounded.
Piers must be the worst interviewer I've come across, ever. There's no objectivity. There's no dialogue. He's so strongly biased that it hurts to watch. Basically he keeps blaming the interviewee again and again. Same argument again and again. He doesn't listen a word he's told, he interrupts constantly and keeps coming back to the start. He keeps getting called up on his BS by all these guys but he just keeps at it until the accused is fed up and leaves. And every episode was exactly the same!
This abomination of a documentary does not: -Bring up any new information or evidence -Prove anyone quilty or innocent -Have _ANY_ information value
What it does: -Sets a textbook example of a worst case scenario interview.
How and why was this ever realeased?