adamhoulding
Joined May 2015
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews3
adamhoulding's rating
This film is good. There, I've said it. It's not the best biblical film, but it's certainly not the worst. It tries to give a 'realistic' take on the bible story of Exodus and at times it really really works. The cinematography is great, the acting - while at times only passable - is sound and the narrative is good. The idea of the Parting of the Red Sea as a tsunami is my personal favourite idea, as the idea that Ramses is simply evil or only envious of Moses.
Some find it controversial that Moses uses sabotage tactics akin to modern guerrilla groups, and that the plagues affected everyone both Egyptian and Jewish. They don't bother me as a Christian, but I can understand why some might. The overuse of white actors does bother me a little, but it's simply Hollywood politics. Charlton Heston was as white as they came, but nobody complained about him or the fact he visually clashed with the 'ethnic' Yul Brynner.
Overall, a decent bible movie that tries something fresh. Not everyone will like it, but it's certainly different. It's no Prince of Egypt, but it's absolutely not the Innocence of Muslims. It is a good Ridley Scott movie, akin to his Robin Hood interpretation.
Some find it controversial that Moses uses sabotage tactics akin to modern guerrilla groups, and that the plagues affected everyone both Egyptian and Jewish. They don't bother me as a Christian, but I can understand why some might. The overuse of white actors does bother me a little, but it's simply Hollywood politics. Charlton Heston was as white as they came, but nobody complained about him or the fact he visually clashed with the 'ethnic' Yul Brynner.
Overall, a decent bible movie that tries something fresh. Not everyone will like it, but it's certainly different. It's no Prince of Egypt, but it's absolutely not the Innocence of Muslims. It is a good Ridley Scott movie, akin to his Robin Hood interpretation.
For the uninitiated, 'Spooks' (or MI5 as the Yanks say) was a British television show centered around MI5 spies (nicknamed Spooks and essentially the British NSA). Be under no illusions: this doesn't have blind patriotism, missing super-weapons or a suave chiseled hero. And while Kit Harington is the handsome lead star, the actual star is none other than long-time veteran Peter Firth.
Ah Peter Firth. Never has a older man with wrinkles and a receding hairline been so bad-ass. Firth is the blend of George Smiley and Jack Bauer, a very British and Un-Hollywood-y figure. And that's the key to The Greater Good's success: it feels fresh and oh so British that it may confuse the Yank audience expecting car chases and epic showdowns. Even the Arabic villain is sympathetic, never cartoonish or monologuing, and similar in part to Anwar al- Awlaki. Even a slightly simple Kit Harington fits perfectly in the thrilling spy jigsaw, being a disgraced case officer slightly too soft for such a cold world.
And yes, case officer. Not secret agent, as one is completely disposable and the other uses such people to achieve, yes, the Greater Good. Bond would not last in this world, and Bauer would make melodrama of decisions. Pierce would be break it down to cruel ugly arithmetic, one dies while two lives. As modern spy-craft goes, this is the most realistic to hit the big screen yet.
If you haven't seen the television series, this is a solid British spy movie with a thrilling storyline. If you have, some sweet Easter eggs will leave you smiling with secret glee. This feels like not a television movie but a gritty British film worthy of recognition. The actors, directing, setting compliment each other perfectly. It feels like going to a fancy restaurant and eating the greatest dish of Bangers and Mash. Simply thrilling and unafraid to let the audience think, this is a solid movie experience.
This is destined to have a sequel. If not, it at least is a beautiful little gem in a pile of stones.
Ah Peter Firth. Never has a older man with wrinkles and a receding hairline been so bad-ass. Firth is the blend of George Smiley and Jack Bauer, a very British and Un-Hollywood-y figure. And that's the key to The Greater Good's success: it feels fresh and oh so British that it may confuse the Yank audience expecting car chases and epic showdowns. Even the Arabic villain is sympathetic, never cartoonish or monologuing, and similar in part to Anwar al- Awlaki. Even a slightly simple Kit Harington fits perfectly in the thrilling spy jigsaw, being a disgraced case officer slightly too soft for such a cold world.
And yes, case officer. Not secret agent, as one is completely disposable and the other uses such people to achieve, yes, the Greater Good. Bond would not last in this world, and Bauer would make melodrama of decisions. Pierce would be break it down to cruel ugly arithmetic, one dies while two lives. As modern spy-craft goes, this is the most realistic to hit the big screen yet.
If you haven't seen the television series, this is a solid British spy movie with a thrilling storyline. If you have, some sweet Easter eggs will leave you smiling with secret glee. This feels like not a television movie but a gritty British film worthy of recognition. The actors, directing, setting compliment each other perfectly. It feels like going to a fancy restaurant and eating the greatest dish of Bangers and Mash. Simply thrilling and unafraid to let the audience think, this is a solid movie experience.
This is destined to have a sequel. If not, it at least is a beautiful little gem in a pile of stones.