MissuzT

Old news. This couple had so much potential, but because they are stuck in the past, they will never have relevance for the future. They spend so much time repeatedly telling their short story, as if they missed a detail that might change our minds about them--this time, a cacophony of spliced timelines that are more schizophrenic than deductive. So sad. This couple needs to jump off the #poorme train because it is conducted by self-destruction and fueled by burning irreplaceable family ties. Wake up Harry and Meghan, your time is at hand! Change your course before you completely derail your lives and the lives of your children.

...why should we? This is one way to take advantage of a family who loved their baby girl so much. I don't mean to be disrespectful, but this movie was made too early, in my opinion. Nothing has been advanced scientifically since cryogentic's inception--not like we needed here. The movie established at the beginning, that the family's decision was based on science and then wove in the story of love. In the end, the father suggests to his hurting son (maybe because he saw his sister's body being disemboweled and then being quickly dehydrated) that his baby daughter's head will be reanimated when time travel has been discovered, and of course attached to another body. It didn't escape my notice that the father seemed to be living vicariously through his son. Hope the 2nd daughter doesn't have to do the same with her sister.

I have read the novel several times (and I don't usually read a novel more than once). The story is about the redeeming love that Michael has for Angel and the love Christ has for us all. But the story centers on Angel, a prostitute, and the setting, a brothel. However, I was truly shocked at the amount of skin that was revealed in the scenes, but then I saw that Francine Rivers co-wrote the screenplay and was relieved that she knew how the scenes where being interpreted. Still, it left a distaste in my mouth.