tspear-61831
Joined Jun 2015
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
tspear-61831's rating
Is it the worst movie ever? No.
Does it insult your intelligence? Yes.
"Project Almanac" tries to be too many movies at once. Is it a coming of age movie? Is it a time travel movie? Is it a romantic comedy? Is it a found footage film? Is it an action film? Is it a sci-fi film? The makers of this movie would have you believe, yes all of the above.
Unfortunately, it never really gains any ground in any of the sub genre's listed.
Once you get past the fact that the premise is entirely implausible, two teens find their father's old camera which leads to them discovering an unfinished project of his beneath the ground in the basement, the movie continues to trip on itself.
As is the down fall of most time travel movies, the film makers would like us to believe that certain occurrences and acts are a result of time travel, but that reality would have already incorporated their time travel so that makes it impossible.
The plot revolves around a group of 5 teenagers doing adolescent things that are superficial and irrelevant. The plot ignores the "ripple" effects of these things like media coverage and IRS investigations but then introduces "ripple" effects later in the film when love becomes involved.
It's an inconsistent and unaware plot.
Catch it on TBS or USA in a few years. Not worth the $5 rental.
Stick to movies like "Looper" and "Predestination" for entertaining and recently produced time travel movies.
Does it insult your intelligence? Yes.
"Project Almanac" tries to be too many movies at once. Is it a coming of age movie? Is it a time travel movie? Is it a romantic comedy? Is it a found footage film? Is it an action film? Is it a sci-fi film? The makers of this movie would have you believe, yes all of the above.
Unfortunately, it never really gains any ground in any of the sub genre's listed.
Once you get past the fact that the premise is entirely implausible, two teens find their father's old camera which leads to them discovering an unfinished project of his beneath the ground in the basement, the movie continues to trip on itself.
As is the down fall of most time travel movies, the film makers would like us to believe that certain occurrences and acts are a result of time travel, but that reality would have already incorporated their time travel so that makes it impossible.
The plot revolves around a group of 5 teenagers doing adolescent things that are superficial and irrelevant. The plot ignores the "ripple" effects of these things like media coverage and IRS investigations but then introduces "ripple" effects later in the film when love becomes involved.
It's an inconsistent and unaware plot.
Catch it on TBS or USA in a few years. Not worth the $5 rental.
Stick to movies like "Looper" and "Predestination" for entertaining and recently produced time travel movies.
The best part of "Run All Night" are the steely performances by Ed Harris and Joel Kinnaman.
Liam Neeson is solid but the previous two steal the show.
It is definitely worth a rental but not a purchase. The plot is predictable, but that's expected and doesn't derail from the entertainment value. It prevents us from becoming attached or emotionally invested in Kinneman's character's family; but we weren't really expecting to anyway were we? Fans of "Running Scared", "A History of Violence" and Kinnaman's show "The Killing" will enjoy this movie.
Liam Neeson is solid but the previous two steal the show.
It is definitely worth a rental but not a purchase. The plot is predictable, but that's expected and doesn't derail from the entertainment value. It prevents us from becoming attached or emotionally invested in Kinneman's character's family; but we weren't really expecting to anyway were we? Fans of "Running Scared", "A History of Violence" and Kinnaman's show "The Killing" will enjoy this movie.
Were this movie made before 1999, it would probably warrant a score of 9.
However, this movie suffers from an affliction called "Shyamalan-ism" thanks to the 1999 movie, The Sixth Sense.
"Shyamalan-ism" - The condition of trying to guess twists within a movie's plot before they occur. Usually afflicts viewers after seeing "The Sixth Sense" and subsequently wanting to be the first one to "get it." To be fair, Focus isn't the first movie to be a victim of "Shyamalan-ism." Every movie directed by M. Knight Shymalan since the Sixth Sense has been a victim of it. The Oceans 11 trilogy was a victim of this, as were many more movies I'm sure you can think of.
The problem with Focus isn't that the viewer spends the entire time trying to figure out if there is a plot twist and if so, what it is. The problem with Focus is that it assumes the viewer will do this, so the writers try to "trick" the audience. However, it is done in a way that indicates to the viewer that the writers are aware of their detective skills which therefore forces the viewer to second guess his/her initial prediction and make another.
Are you focused yet? The movie screams for the viewer to focus, which plays to its detriment rather than it's charm.
Smith and Robbie have great chemistry and deliver great performances despite the over thought plot which starts as interesting and then unravels in the third act.
It is definitely worth a watch and has moments of entertaining quality.
In the end though, "Shyamalan-ism" leaves the viewer feeling unsatisfied and wanting more from the plot that is so frail it's practically a ghost itself.
However, this movie suffers from an affliction called "Shyamalan-ism" thanks to the 1999 movie, The Sixth Sense.
"Shyamalan-ism" - The condition of trying to guess twists within a movie's plot before they occur. Usually afflicts viewers after seeing "The Sixth Sense" and subsequently wanting to be the first one to "get it." To be fair, Focus isn't the first movie to be a victim of "Shyamalan-ism." Every movie directed by M. Knight Shymalan since the Sixth Sense has been a victim of it. The Oceans 11 trilogy was a victim of this, as were many more movies I'm sure you can think of.
The problem with Focus isn't that the viewer spends the entire time trying to figure out if there is a plot twist and if so, what it is. The problem with Focus is that it assumes the viewer will do this, so the writers try to "trick" the audience. However, it is done in a way that indicates to the viewer that the writers are aware of their detective skills which therefore forces the viewer to second guess his/her initial prediction and make another.
Are you focused yet? The movie screams for the viewer to focus, which plays to its detriment rather than it's charm.
Smith and Robbie have great chemistry and deliver great performances despite the over thought plot which starts as interesting and then unravels in the third act.
It is definitely worth a watch and has moments of entertaining quality.
In the end though, "Shyamalan-ism" leaves the viewer feeling unsatisfied and wanting more from the plot that is so frail it's practically a ghost itself.