kdavies-69347

Yikes! The episode is so badly written, it's hard to understand that anyone would want to produce it as is. I'm not sure what they were thinking but the episode starts off so strong and ends up in the realm of absolutely obtuse.

I wish I could say it's very well acted, but the motivations for the three main characters are so vague, you have to wonder why the actors never asked themselves the simple question of "Why would I do this?"

The real tragedy though is the garbage plot-line, and the fact that that they throw the central tragedy right under the bus as soon as it happens.

There was very little research into space flight as well. It's supposed to be a 'retro-tech' theme, but even with the fastest means of communication currently known to man, there would always be a delay between signal and receiver. Which makes the whole thing kind of... dumb.

Also the idea that there would be only 2 people on an interstellar flight is utter ridiculous (all flights since the Apollo missions have had 3 minimum, engineer, pilot, and medical).

I can't bear to watch this again and both my wife and I were so frustrated with the bad character choices the actors chose and the director allowed, that it made us verbally yell at the screen "Why? It makes no sense!"

It's highly predictable 2/3rds of the way through, but the inciting incident of this episode was thrown under the bus. It would have been far more interesting to see a man dealing with absolute loss while trapped a million miles away than this stupid garbage.

Overrated to a high degree.

Its the same damn movie as before with worse writing, terrible cringe-worthy dialogue, and plot holes that ruin the previous entries. Just a bunch of hackneyed moments played over and over again so they can drag an 80min movie out so it can last 4 episodes, including the worst character development in the series (or lack there of). The writers, director and even Netflix should be ashamed of this Trash. What a wasted opportunity.

The animation itself is quite beautiful though. But lets face they're litterally reusing character models and settings from Degeneration.

Eye in the sky is not a war film. The scenes that take place have a military context, but this movie is not about terrorism, catching the bad guy, or even preventing further acts of violence from men and women who hate the western world. This film is about the consequences of our actions as a nation, and our willingness to let good people die in the name of freedom and security.

What this film brings to the viewer is a rather realistic view of the quagmire of legal and moral responsibilities shared by various government and military bodies. There are so many moments in this film, that make the viewer question what is right and what is wrong. Many of the decisions of military action is done by people in offices, crewmen stationed halfway around the world, and politicians with their own agendas. Here we witness the intricacies of this process and the impact these groups of people have on the third world, where most of the foreign enemy lives. But so do a many people and families, whom lives are forever altered by the actions of just a few men and women in who consider it their job to protect the people and interests of their own nations.

Helen Mirren portrays Colonel Katherine Powell of U.K. Special Forces. Her mission is to discover the location, and carry out the possible termination of 3 terrorists at the top of various global watch lists, currently spotted in Kenya. To do so, she will be leading a joint operation between several offices. A team of U.S air-force drone pilots providing over-watch (Phoebe Fox and Aaron Paul), Kenyan Special Forces on the ground (Barkhad Abdi), while relaying details to U.K Head of Command based in London (with Alan Rickman). It's a well blended cast, and each person brings something unique to the table. I personally enjoyed seeing Mirren's determination in her role, one originally meant for a male lead, but her cocksure attitude and resolve to complete her mission resounds in her performance. Barkhad Abdi was a very nice addition, he shows a lot of heart in his actions, and as a Somali national he uses his language skills to bring authenticity to the screen. Alan Rickman, of course, should be mentioned not because of his untimely passing, but because of the broad spectrum he brings to the screen. His voice resounds authority in his role, and in his final scene he delivers a fantastic line about the lives of soldiers I don't think anyone should miss.

For those of us who have served in the military, have family members who do, or support our seemingly endless and idyllic war on terrorism abroad, I recommend you watch this moral tale. Director Gavin Hood designed it to make you think about the consequences of our actions abroad, and the absurd hypocrisy of ending innocent lives abroad in our pursuit of freedom and security at home.

8/10