truemotion
Joined Oct 2015
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings71
truemotion's rating
Reviews22
truemotion's rating
This could have been better with a tighter script and stronger editing. A very 'case of the week' vibe that did a decent job with dialogue and plotting. But I did a lot of fast-forwarding. The flashback scenes were over-long, over-acted, and over-produced. I admittedly despise flashbacks, rarely finding them useful or appropriate. In this case I found them about 28% useful.
Great dialogue, an unflinching view of the circumstances, and an unusually objective look at politics and life of both natives and whites. Seeing Stewart play a crook was a nice change of pace, and particularly for me when he plays my kind of crook: one who can rationalize and explain himself well. People don't like him, but they know he's right.
Burnam sums up nicely how this series ended up in the dumpster. Besides modeling characters on some of the worst in history: Jar Jar, Neelix, and Janeway. It wont be long before the computer insistently queries "shall we play a game?" The episode can guest star Matthew Broderick playing a doctor brought in to psychoanalyze Zora. An emotional breakthrough will lead to Starfleet's first crying ship.