kathleenmcbrair

If I'd paid attention and saw it was a Nancy Grace piece, I would have skipped it altogether. Wouldn't it be nice if there was more than opinion and conjecture by people who are wholly unconnected to the case. Nancy Grace needs to take her old-school "hooker" terminology and go do something other than crime gossip. As to her opinion, that matters even less.

Unfortunately, this piece just drones on over unsubstantiated minutiae and irrelevant issues. Derrick Levasseur seems to be following the same path as Nancy Grace, no more than a commentator on a game not seen.

Just another filler crime piece by those who love to hear themselves talk.

This was great fun in that it was like time-warping back to the 70s, when my stepmother grossly miscolored her hair, wore hideous blue eyeshadow and was mired in denial about certain family members.

What was not fun is watching re-hashing of covered crime. Every year, 4,000 women are killed by partners. That leaves a pretty good number of male victims too. I've seen the same crimes covered over and over by ID.

I subscribe one month per year to catch up on anything new. The new material runs out quickly, and half the month is spent on old, even if it's touted as new.

Unfortunately, "Discovery" is inappropriate to the name. Let's call it "Investigation Regurg."

If you watch true crime shows on ID, you will learn that there have been very few murders in the last few decades. So few have been covered--murders just as or more devastating than the ones covered. Per murder stats, there never needs to be a repeat, and very few murders are pretty. Every cop claims their murder to be the most disturbing. Hon, you ain't seen nothin' yet. And if it's up to ID, we never will. If you want to be a hero, do it without a paycheck and get off the camera.