compjazzca-68116

Painfully dragged out. Not a one-of-a-kind story; stretched out over 5 hours with lots of filler music and long segues. Had to back up and rely on CCs on some of the mumbly dialogue - not just the dialect. Kept thinking "I've seen this" but IMDb says it came out 2023. In some ways I can't help but wonder if this is a promo for Jenna Coleman and/or the soundtrack, it sure was long considering the content. It was a lot like a made for TV movie directed and/or edited by one who didn't who didn't know the meaning of "cut" or "crop". It's like a book with 40 pages of content stretched out to satisfy the publisher 250 page requirements.

IMO, I find it hard to believe there's consideration of a 2nd season. I, for one, have better things to do with my time and won't be watching.

Far under-rated at 4.9! One of the problems with today's viewers seems to be their extreme need for fast, gory, action packed "horror".

This is a great film for those who can deal with a slower paced show with things to think on. There are fabulous, unusual, eerie views of some very remote and very old scenery of house, and decrepit light house quite possibly now gone.

Would have liked to have seen the sheep theme worked in more. Never did we see a flock of hundreds as mentioned in the want ad. They can have such distinct personalities it would have been cool to see them as representatives of people of his past... and a bit more relationship with his 8 year old dog.

What spurred me to watch this obviously wasn't the ratings. It was the remoteness of the Scottish countryside and part of a trailer showing the great cinematography expressing the power of wild nature.

Recommended for a relaxing watch which might leave you with things to think on about your own relationships, paranoia and phobias. Enjoy - I sure did!

I'm not one who typically watches heist shows; it was Dafoe that lured me in and I'm glad for it. Inside was the most enjoyable film I've seen in a long while, however, I may need to explain that I was raised to be a critic as my father was a sound editor and somewhat of a crank. Comments like "wasn't that a fun show" were not part of our conversations. Instead, movies were rated for acting, cinematography, lighting, direction, etc., etc.... and of course sound. Also, I've studied Fine Art and Art History at post-secondary levels among other pursuits. I'm not going to pick any nits because the few worthy of picking can easily be dismissed as artistic license.

For me, this was a most enjoyable show. Despite the seriousness of Nemo's dilemma several times I broke out in laughter to the point of tears. Dafoe was the perect person to fill this role. His aging body with all its wrinkles, sags and crevices added much to the 'art' of this film. Kudos Dafoe!