joshuaalguire
Joined Mar 2016
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
joshuaalguire's rating
A story about a broken woman and her relationship with her family. Her sister in particular, who feels like the pillar around which everyone develops.
I was pleasantly blindsided with this show. In today's social climate, a drama about an independent young woman invariably means a ham fisted "white men are evil" narrative. While there are lots of male characters in this show, some of whom are reprehensible; they are diverse and interesting and most importantly, they serve the narrative well.
The reason I say you've seen this before is because the main character is struggling financially and is a borderline alcoholic with highly questionable morals stumbling towards redemption. Which describes innumerable main characters before this except... they are almost always male. While there have been lots of female main characters in the past, very few are this broken or honest and they rarely if ever are forced to be accountable for their failings. Fleabag is one of the best tragic characters I've ever seen, period. She does lots of terrible things while still being sympathetic. But her actions definitely have consequences in this show.
The main character breaks the fourth wall, a lot. Which is a cool cinematic trick we've seen before. But it is done so seamlessly that it works well and feels refreshing.
My only complaint would be that rather than six 23 minute episodes this should have been one two hour (and change) movie.
I highly recommend this show.
I was pleasantly blindsided with this show. In today's social climate, a drama about an independent young woman invariably means a ham fisted "white men are evil" narrative. While there are lots of male characters in this show, some of whom are reprehensible; they are diverse and interesting and most importantly, they serve the narrative well.
The reason I say you've seen this before is because the main character is struggling financially and is a borderline alcoholic with highly questionable morals stumbling towards redemption. Which describes innumerable main characters before this except... they are almost always male. While there have been lots of female main characters in the past, very few are this broken or honest and they rarely if ever are forced to be accountable for their failings. Fleabag is one of the best tragic characters I've ever seen, period. She does lots of terrible things while still being sympathetic. But her actions definitely have consequences in this show.
The main character breaks the fourth wall, a lot. Which is a cool cinematic trick we've seen before. But it is done so seamlessly that it works well and feels refreshing.
My only complaint would be that rather than six 23 minute episodes this should have been one two hour (and change) movie.
I highly recommend this show.
A series of segments about NYT reporters covering Donald Trump's presidency. If you've ever wondered what it's like inside the NYT echo chamber, this may interest you. For everyone else, it's basically a ripoff of "The Circus" except instead of last week, the content is over a year old and instead of personable hosts there are a bunch of pretentious NYT reporters.
I get it, Trump is awful, but I just suffered through two years of the MSM obsessing about Russia and whinging about mean tweets. Why would I want to watch a documentary series review the same inane partisan hackery in detail?
I get it, Trump is awful, but I just suffered through two years of the MSM obsessing about Russia and whinging about mean tweets. Why would I want to watch a documentary series review the same inane partisan hackery in detail?