senesertekin

I do not get it. OK, I would like this movie better if I was 8 and it was the year 1999. Come on. The whole movie is full of logical mistakes and I am not talking about the dinosaurs, I am talking about the plot itself. The big problem that is possible to see in almost all Hollywood movies in the last 10 years. That is why I prefer European Art Cinema. I mean, I normally can take it when the mistakes are small, but in this one, oh boy no way. I can not stand it. I just can not. Two main problems, Idiotic plot and unnecessary details. I would say the only good thing about this movie is Mr. Pratt's acting. But again, the way characters interact, the following of the plot, it is just, so amateur, this kind of stuff happened in 90's or early 2000's. Come on it is fricking 2015. I believe CGI and some good acting and roots of this movie got it a 7.0 on IMDb. But it should not have. This is 5.0 even when you try to be very optimistic about it.

What should be expected from this movie? I believe that is the most important question before watching these kind of movies. It obviously will not take you and challenge your brain to understand what is happening. The plot is much simpler in a comparison with the prequel. When the plot is much simpler, that also means this movie will not appeal to the group of people it supposed to appeal. You know what that means? Drumroll please... It means you will lose $30.000.000. I mean, what were they trying to do? Were they trying to make people laugh? If that was it, why did not they just put Jesses Eisenberg in a room with that poor interviewer girl again. That way, they would not spend $90.000.000 for a dead project. Come on people. Hollywood may have done this just to keep the tradition of butchering decent movies by making terrible sequels. That would explain it. But, there is one good thing about the movie, the acting, at the beginning of the movie by the young Dylan, that was incredible, just incredible.