andywheeler-11072
Joined Sep 2016
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews14
andywheeler-11072's rating
Honestly, I had a sinking feeling after watching the trailer. The humour felt forced, and Liam Neeson already seemed miscast as Frank Drebin Jr. But nothing prepared me for how truly lousy the full film would be.
In 90 minutes of pure torture, I chuckled once and laughed out loud exactly once - thanks to a halfway decent sight gag buried somewhere in the middle. Aside from that? Tumbleweed. I seriously considered walking out more than once, but sadly, I stuck it out, hoping it might improve. It didn't. It just got worse.
Liam Neeson, despite the name similarity, is no Leslie Nielsen. Not even close. He lacks the genius deadpan timing that made the original work so brilliant. He's just not funny. At all.
Pamela looked great, but even her big 'comedy' moment was embarrassingly bad. I honestly don't understand how this film has solid ratings on Rotten Tomatoes or IMDb. Were we watching the same movie?
As far as I'm concerned, this never should've made it to cinemas. And whoever wrote this script? Lock them up for crimes against comedy.
In 90 minutes of pure torture, I chuckled once and laughed out loud exactly once - thanks to a halfway decent sight gag buried somewhere in the middle. Aside from that? Tumbleweed. I seriously considered walking out more than once, but sadly, I stuck it out, hoping it might improve. It didn't. It just got worse.
Liam Neeson, despite the name similarity, is no Leslie Nielsen. Not even close. He lacks the genius deadpan timing that made the original work so brilliant. He's just not funny. At all.
Pamela looked great, but even her big 'comedy' moment was embarrassingly bad. I honestly don't understand how this film has solid ratings on Rotten Tomatoes or IMDb. Were we watching the same movie?
As far as I'm concerned, this never should've made it to cinemas. And whoever wrote this script? Lock them up for crimes against comedy.
My honest thoughts on Snow White and just to clarify, Disney hasn't paid me to write something nice.
Disney's live-action remake of Snow White has been one of the most talked-about-and often unjustly maligned-films online. Despite the polarised critics and the relentless hate campaign, I firmly believe this film is pure Disney magic.
What truly stood out was how the story was adjusted for a slightly modern take. The film not only answers lingering questions about Snow White's skin color and the origin of her name but does so with a refreshing narrative twist that feels both authentic and engaging.
Rachel Zegglar delivers a brilliant performance that perfectly captures the quintessential Disney voice. She brings a captivating charm to the role, embodying the magic and wonder that the character deserves.
One of the main concerns leading up to the film was the CGI portrayal of the dwarfs. I was pleasantly surprised-these digital characters were executed flawlessly, preserving the charm of their animated counterparts. Their scenes in the diamond mine, in particular, looked stunning on screen, and I couldn't imagine them being any better served by human actors.
The musical numbers hit many high notes as well. I loved the classic "Hi Ho" and "Whistle While You Work," and the new song "Wishing on a Wish" was nicely done. While not every song hit the mark, the soundtrack overall enriched the fairytale atmosphere of the film.
Gal Gadot's performance, while occasionally a bit over-the-top, ultimately worked well-especially in her portrayal of the old witch with the poison apple. Even though some moments felt slightly exaggerated, her energy added an interesting dynamic to the film.
Compared to other live-action remakes like Wicked, which certainly had its moments, this version of Snow White stands out as my favorite Disney live-action adaptation so far. It exudes a pure fairytale feel that pays homage to the original animation while embracing a modern sensibility. The film might not have the grand scale of Wicked, but its charm, humor, and heart make it a delightful experience. The kids in the cinema laughed at key moments and all seemed be saying they enjoyed it leaving the cinema. My grandson, Charlie, loved it.
I wholeheartedly recommend taking your kids to see it. They'll love it, and so will you.
Rating: 7.5/10.
Disney's live-action remake of Snow White has been one of the most talked-about-and often unjustly maligned-films online. Despite the polarised critics and the relentless hate campaign, I firmly believe this film is pure Disney magic.
What truly stood out was how the story was adjusted for a slightly modern take. The film not only answers lingering questions about Snow White's skin color and the origin of her name but does so with a refreshing narrative twist that feels both authentic and engaging.
Rachel Zegglar delivers a brilliant performance that perfectly captures the quintessential Disney voice. She brings a captivating charm to the role, embodying the magic and wonder that the character deserves.
One of the main concerns leading up to the film was the CGI portrayal of the dwarfs. I was pleasantly surprised-these digital characters were executed flawlessly, preserving the charm of their animated counterparts. Their scenes in the diamond mine, in particular, looked stunning on screen, and I couldn't imagine them being any better served by human actors.
The musical numbers hit many high notes as well. I loved the classic "Hi Ho" and "Whistle While You Work," and the new song "Wishing on a Wish" was nicely done. While not every song hit the mark, the soundtrack overall enriched the fairytale atmosphere of the film.
Gal Gadot's performance, while occasionally a bit over-the-top, ultimately worked well-especially in her portrayal of the old witch with the poison apple. Even though some moments felt slightly exaggerated, her energy added an interesting dynamic to the film.
Compared to other live-action remakes like Wicked, which certainly had its moments, this version of Snow White stands out as my favorite Disney live-action adaptation so far. It exudes a pure fairytale feel that pays homage to the original animation while embracing a modern sensibility. The film might not have the grand scale of Wicked, but its charm, humor, and heart make it a delightful experience. The kids in the cinema laughed at key moments and all seemed be saying they enjoyed it leaving the cinema. My grandson, Charlie, loved it.
I wholeheartedly recommend taking your kids to see it. They'll love it, and so will you.
Rating: 7.5/10.
Review of Nosferatu.
A Sinister Homage Rating: 7/10
The 2024 Nosferatu film, starring the inimitable Doug Jones as Count Orlok, offers a stylish and visually striking reimagining of the 1922 classic. With a graphic novel-inspired aesthetic akin to Sin City, the film leans heavily into its moody, stylized visuals, creating an atmosphere that feels both fresh and nostalgic.
Doug Jones, a master of physical acting, perfectly channels Max Schreck's original performance, capturing the eerie, unsettling presence that made the character iconic. The modern makeup effects pay faithful homage to Orlok's original design, updating it with subtle enhancements that emphasize his grotesque charm without losing the character's vintage horror appeal. Jones' movements and expressions are mesmerizing, making him a worthy successor to Schreck's legacy.
The narrative, while not groundbreaking, stays true to the tone and spirit of the original, offering a faithful tribute rather than an outright reimagining. The Director clearly crafted the film with reverence, focusing on evoking the same primal unease the 1922 film instilled in audiences nearly a century ago.
While some critics have dismissed the film for its perceived lack of innovation, it's important to watch it for what it is: an homage. As a modern love letter to one of horror's most enduring films, it succeeds admirably. The graphic novel-inspired visuals may not be to everyone's taste, but they create a distinctive look that sets this Nosferatu apart from more traditional horror films.
In the end, this Nosferatu isn't trying to reinvent the wheel-it's a celebration of its cinematic roots, elevated by Doug Jones' haunting performance and a uniquely stylized visual approach. For fans of the original or those who appreciate atmospheric, graphic novel-inspired horror, it's worth a watch. Just embrace it for what it is, and you'll find it to be a perfectly fine (and at times chilling) homage.
A Sinister Homage Rating: 7/10
The 2024 Nosferatu film, starring the inimitable Doug Jones as Count Orlok, offers a stylish and visually striking reimagining of the 1922 classic. With a graphic novel-inspired aesthetic akin to Sin City, the film leans heavily into its moody, stylized visuals, creating an atmosphere that feels both fresh and nostalgic.
Doug Jones, a master of physical acting, perfectly channels Max Schreck's original performance, capturing the eerie, unsettling presence that made the character iconic. The modern makeup effects pay faithful homage to Orlok's original design, updating it with subtle enhancements that emphasize his grotesque charm without losing the character's vintage horror appeal. Jones' movements and expressions are mesmerizing, making him a worthy successor to Schreck's legacy.
The narrative, while not groundbreaking, stays true to the tone and spirit of the original, offering a faithful tribute rather than an outright reimagining. The Director clearly crafted the film with reverence, focusing on evoking the same primal unease the 1922 film instilled in audiences nearly a century ago.
While some critics have dismissed the film for its perceived lack of innovation, it's important to watch it for what it is: an homage. As a modern love letter to one of horror's most enduring films, it succeeds admirably. The graphic novel-inspired visuals may not be to everyone's taste, but they create a distinctive look that sets this Nosferatu apart from more traditional horror films.
In the end, this Nosferatu isn't trying to reinvent the wheel-it's a celebration of its cinematic roots, elevated by Doug Jones' haunting performance and a uniquely stylized visual approach. For fans of the original or those who appreciate atmospheric, graphic novel-inspired horror, it's worth a watch. Just embrace it for what it is, and you'll find it to be a perfectly fine (and at times chilling) homage.