livinghere-99749

I can only agree with every other negative thing that's been said. The rating is worrying beyond the show. Do we have an epidemic of pretentious people or something? They want more of this pointless trash? If you think this is a good way to spend time, or good writing, you need to see a doctor or pop out of whatever delusional narcissistic bubble you're in. Get some air. Learnt to write stories and appreciate actual skill rather than pseudo-intellectual muck and quasi plot. By the way, I quite liked the first two seasons.

Giving a 10 for balance. Realistically I'd give a 7. It's pretty silly and light, but very tight, and knows what it is. All the characters have a simple, fun and direct journey. All the little plot elements (and there are more than the average amount) fit into the logic of the movie and work, whilst being paced well. Constantly entertaining and humorous dialogue. Very cartoon like characters. Very good entertainment for those who can just accept these types of movies.

10 to make the score higher. Real score 7. It's very subtle movie on every level and involves some recognition of the world portrayed, or else the characters may be too bland. They do after all inhabit a boring world. I thought the dialogue was OK, despite people saying otherwise. It was natural and did the job. It provided a dead pan humour as lines were played straight. It did have space for more interesting plot and some twists and turns but the padding was OK. It was a little predictable and nothing new or interesting is to be found. The ending could have been better. Seems to split people down the middle. I've seen a lot worse. Mark Addy did a good job. I don't know why it wasn't more successful. Maybe after lock stock people seen this as an inferior version of that style.