Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsBest Of 2025Holiday Watch GuideGotham AwardsCelebrity PhotosSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app

samwa-27311

Joined Nov 2016

Badges4

To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Explore badges

Reviews105

samwa-27311's rating
The Honeymooners

The Honeymooners

8.6
2
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • Denigrating to women, but read my review

    Hi.

    First of all, kindly read this with an open mind.

    I watched the show in the early to mid 60s, and other years, I watched it every 10 or 20 years.

    First of all, you could see that it lasted just one and a half seasons, that should tell you everything you need to know.

    2. Obviously, Jackie Gleason's character and he himself, are abusive, angry, condescending to women, and much more.

    The print on this television show and the message itself, have not aged well at all.

    The third point is simply this- everyone knows that The Flintstones (1960) was a complete ripoff of The Honeymooners, but the Flintstones, while yes, there were some funny moments in this, is simply another extension of the angry man, in this case, Fred, ala Jackie Gleason, or if you prefer, Ralph Kramden, is simply another indication of the abusive husband that nobody wants to see.

    Lastly, may I say absolutely, positively, do not dislike my review

    This is very important.
    That's Entertainment! III

    That's Entertainment! III

    7.5
    3
  • Aug 19, 2025
  • B

    We all love MGM musicals of course, but this one was, first of all, mostly B movies.

    I am quite knowledgeable about old movies, and 80% of the movies in this, I never even heard of.

    Next, would be the narration of Lena Horne.

    I couldn't believe it.

    It is almost entirely condescending, toward other actresses and actors, if you listen closely to her narration- and she has a very boasting attitude, in her narrative.

    -Concerning Brigadoon, I could think of at least three or four of the dance numbers, that were far better then Heather on the Hill,

    In conclusion, I have seen this twice, once recently, the other time about 8 or 10 years ago, and it pales in comparison to the first one, and the second.

    That's Entertainment 2, is by far, the superior of the three.
    Guess Who's Coming to Dinner

    Guess Who's Coming to Dinner

    7.8
    1
  • May 29, 2025
  • Please consider my review of this difficult movie

    It is very hard to know where to begin.

    This is an unfortunate movie Spencer Tracy is one of my favorite actors Katharin Hepburn is one of my least favorite actresses, let us first examine the concept that in 1967 when this was made no one in America is married or engaged to somebody within 20 minutes, and certainly not interracial, so this was obviously the owner of the movie that is to say the producer and or the director's idea of trying to infuse into American society, something that was so unconscionable and using two famous actors to ostensively get their stage play, that is their Concepts to the American public.

    Next of course is the Hideous and so utterly phony accent of Hepburn everybody knows this it sounds so affected and almost nauseous that it ruins the picture, just with that concept.

    Next would be that the other Katharine is Hepburn's actual niece in real life and the interplay between them is so entirely affected, then there is the understanding that Spencer Tracy who again is one of my favorite actors, but in this one is not only so old but the alcohol problems that he had, come through very clearly in this show and then there is the concept of Poitier saying shut up to his father is so wrong even for that era

    the biggest concern I have however, is to see how many reviewers have rated this 8 to 10 Stars there is much more that I could say but please consider this nobody gets engaged in 20 minutes and the interracial marriage was unheard of in 1967 and almost as difficult to understand today.
    See all reviews

    Recently taken polls

    1 total poll taken
    Unseen Characters
    Taken Jan 18, 2018
    Kelsey Grammer, David Hyde Pierce, John Mahoney, Peri Gilpin, and Jane Leeves in Frasier (1993)

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.