kimmgould
Joined Feb 2017
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews70
kimmgould's rating
This seemed like it might be a low budget production, and at first I thought it was going to be little more than a YouTube pastiche of things we already know.
But the best thing was the interviews with one of his best friends and his daughter (who was Michael Jackson's goddaughter), his bodyguard and his biographer. They shared stories of Michael at home, with his kids. They talked about how devastated he was by the allegations and how it impacted on him.
But the best thing was the interviews with one of his best friends and his daughter (who was Michael Jackson's goddaughter), his bodyguard and his biographer. They shared stories of Michael at home, with his kids. They talked about how devastated he was by the allegations and how it impacted on him.
Jamie Lee Curtis nailed it in one of her interviews. This is a movie about the degradation of women at the end of their lives. The use of the glamour of Las Vegas showgirls to show the slow decline with an eventual fall off a cliff edge - poverty, homelessness - when they are no longer young and sexy. Eddie gives us a view of how older women *are* sexy, but only when they are not being objectified.
The audience laughed quite often in poignant moments, and I suspect it was to cover their discomfort with the journey of the two older women.
The photography was often very close, and it created an intimacy, also showing the flaws of aging bodies that were at odds with the on-stage showgirls.
Some reviewers said the characters were superficial, but I think perhaps that's a lack of personal experience with the issues these women were facing. I enjoyed this movie. It's not tragic, but it is gently heartbreaking at times.
The audience laughed quite often in poignant moments, and I suspect it was to cover their discomfort with the journey of the two older women.
The photography was often very close, and it created an intimacy, also showing the flaws of aging bodies that were at odds with the on-stage showgirls.
Some reviewers said the characters were superficial, but I think perhaps that's a lack of personal experience with the issues these women were facing. I enjoyed this movie. It's not tragic, but it is gently heartbreaking at times.
I was looking forward to listening to the music. I came away feeling like I saw the perfect movie.
The depth of emotional connection I n, bringing the feel of the early 60's -the uncertainty about where the world was heading. Those clinging to the older ways, and the shocking breakthroughs - the death of JFK and Malcolm X, the Freedom Marches - were woven in at every level of the storytelling. Through the music, the politics, I felt as if I was there, in the mix as it was unfolding.
I was struck by how Dylan was driven by his creativity - the songs were pouring through him. He had to write them, he had to perform them.
Another reviewer described him as ambitious. I think it was less ambition and more fate that drove Dylan. Timothy Chalamee was flawless.
As others have said, the period was perfectly reflected. A few times I wondered if they had a time machine and had taken the whole film crew back.
Last thing, the layering in this film - emotionally, visually, musically, historically, is exceptional. Each layer makes the others more meaningful. There's one scene where Dylan is about to go on stage and in the shot we can see Joan Baez, Johnny Cash and Pete Seeger lined up - each stage of his career so far.
A film that will be studied and emulated, I'm sure.
The depth of emotional connection I n, bringing the feel of the early 60's -the uncertainty about where the world was heading. Those clinging to the older ways, and the shocking breakthroughs - the death of JFK and Malcolm X, the Freedom Marches - were woven in at every level of the storytelling. Through the music, the politics, I felt as if I was there, in the mix as it was unfolding.
I was struck by how Dylan was driven by his creativity - the songs were pouring through him. He had to write them, he had to perform them.
Another reviewer described him as ambitious. I think it was less ambition and more fate that drove Dylan. Timothy Chalamee was flawless.
As others have said, the period was perfectly reflected. A few times I wondered if they had a time machine and had taken the whole film crew back.
Last thing, the layering in this film - emotionally, visually, musically, historically, is exceptional. Each layer makes the others more meaningful. There's one scene where Dylan is about to go on stage and in the shot we can see Joan Baez, Johnny Cash and Pete Seeger lined up - each stage of his career so far.
A film that will be studied and emulated, I'm sure.