rssaaiill
Joined Apr 2017
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges4
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings2.2K
rssaaiill's rating
Reviews3
rssaaiill's rating
I have to say this movie in my last viewing did create a plausible rendition of Hamlet. I think its biggest flaw was not the actors, but how they spoke the lines. If you've followed other previous movies; Mel Gibson : Hamlet, or Lawrence Olivia: Hamlet, you know what I mean. The diction, and presentation of the language is very important. I think there are and will be many unexplored renditions of Shakespeare that will be explored in the future.
The biggest flaw in this movie was , as the actors probably already knew was in how the lines were spoken. Shakespeare is generally spoken in groups of three. Not an unbroken rule per se, but, in general.
The biggest flaw in this movie was , as the actors probably already knew was in how the lines were spoken. Shakespeare is generally spoken in groups of three. Not an unbroken rule per se, but, in general.
Enjoyed watching this series. Perhaps, a little over the top with gratuitous violence. I didn't say this but sexual scene in shower was great. Overall, everything was great. Not sure why the bridge is mentioned in so many reviews in comparison. 5 different versions from US to Russia BTW.
For 1898 totally amazing. Even when we rode around like cars on our buts in the early 70s it was amazing. He was the first and father of imagination of that sort.
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken