ricewithaspoon
Joined May 2017
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges7
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings5K
ricewithaspoon's rating
Reviews64
ricewithaspoon's rating
Really?
This is called a "documentary" or reporting nowadays?
I felt embarrassed watching this re-enactment-pseudo-theater-something.
Do yourself a favor and watch Ashleigh Banfield, Stephanie Soo or even Nancy Grace (anything and everything is better than this) if you want the real juicy stuff about the trial.
This, this was neither reporting nor documenting - this was ...bewildering, alienating.
What do these producers think? "Ah lets quickly make a student-re-enactment-Diddy-trial project."?
"This is so hip - everyone is gonna be glued to the screen, and we'll get so many clicks..and we'll cash in some more?" How desperate do you have to be as a production company to create sthg like this?
Flabbergasting.
This is called a "documentary" or reporting nowadays?
I felt embarrassed watching this re-enactment-pseudo-theater-something.
Do yourself a favor and watch Ashleigh Banfield, Stephanie Soo or even Nancy Grace (anything and everything is better than this) if you want the real juicy stuff about the trial.
This, this was neither reporting nor documenting - this was ...bewildering, alienating.
What do these producers think? "Ah lets quickly make a student-re-enactment-Diddy-trial project."?
"This is so hip - everyone is gonna be glued to the screen, and we'll get so many clicks..and we'll cash in some more?" How desperate do you have to be as a production company to create sthg like this?
Flabbergasting.
What a disappointment.
Can somebody explain this kind of 'producing' to me?
Some people narrating re enactments, with minimal original footage .. I mean come on.
Why in the hell are they serving cases that had been covered 46 times already - from all sides?
Are you really expecting a growing or loyal audience by reheating old stuff and arranging it with blurry stock footage?
True crime channels on youtube are doing a better job.
I watched all episodes so far, I knew all the cases and none of them contributed to anything. No new information, nothing to see, nothing to learn.... just a time filler for the comatose.
Why are you doing that? & Is it really profitable?
If you really have to take cases that have been done to death, how about doing exceptional deep-dives?
Can somebody explain this kind of 'producing' to me?
Some people narrating re enactments, with minimal original footage .. I mean come on.
Why in the hell are they serving cases that had been covered 46 times already - from all sides?
Are you really expecting a growing or loyal audience by reheating old stuff and arranging it with blurry stock footage?
True crime channels on youtube are doing a better job.
I watched all episodes so far, I knew all the cases and none of them contributed to anything. No new information, nothing to see, nothing to learn.... just a time filler for the comatose.
Why are you doing that? & Is it really profitable?
If you really have to take cases that have been done to death, how about doing exceptional deep-dives?
I'm noticing British productions covering true crime becoming lazier & lazier.
People, close up, interviewed with a dark filter - a few landscape stock footage shoots in between and perhaps a few photographs & blurry re enactment scenes.
0 original evidence, 0 original material shown.
0 passion for the subject matter.
It feels like 0 effort.
Why?
Why do a 3 part docu series then?
Do I really need to look at 5 'experts' for 3 hrs retelling a story?
Some utube people do a better job researching & covering cases.. it's really depressing.
Opsdygjklshfjdlrkfjhposjfgknmosldavögjdslfkhdjaölsfjhdkgnlkg.
People, close up, interviewed with a dark filter - a few landscape stock footage shoots in between and perhaps a few photographs & blurry re enactment scenes.
0 original evidence, 0 original material shown.
0 passion for the subject matter.
It feels like 0 effort.
Why?
Why do a 3 part docu series then?
Do I really need to look at 5 'experts' for 3 hrs retelling a story?
Some utube people do a better job researching & covering cases.. it's really depressing.
Opsdygjklshfjdlrkfjhposjfgknmosldavögjdslfkhdjaölsfjhdkgnlkg.
