rexchance
Joined Jun 2017
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings452
rexchance's rating
Reviews2
rexchance's rating
If you have any media literacy at all you can see that these activists are desperately trying to keep the show going. If you look into their 'rehabilitation' program it's actually a sea pen, and a relatively small one at that. The reason that all of the versions of this plan have a small operating area is to keep the animals close for public viewing. In the video linked below, Dr. Ingrid Visser outlines the current plans for how this is intended to work. I understand that they can't be released into the wild, but this is frankly just a more scenic, slightly bigger cage, endorsed by ex-trainers at sea world. If they really cared, they'd increase the size of the cage and give the customers binoculars instead of making sea world 2. They have the gall to say 'we're on the right side of history'. In New Zealand where I live you can't call something a sanctuary if the animals are penned in -- then it's a reserve. This documentary is right about its criticisms of sea world etc, but straight up lies to your face about its own motives.
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6wHrZXyrOg.
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6wHrZXyrOg.
