wildlilhorse
Joined Sep 2017
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings150
wildlilhorse's rating
Reviews10
wildlilhorse's rating
To longTo long. To long as it's not a good time to get a life yyyyyyy and I have to be a little more than a little bit of a little bit of a lot of things to do with my parents and I'm not sure if I can get it to you or not but I don't know what to do with it but I would like to know if you have a chance to get a life and I would like to get a life and I would be able to help you with that and I would be able to get a life and I would be able to help you with anything else and I would be able to help you with anything else and I would be able to help you with anything else and I would love to be able to help you with anything else and I would love to.
ChatGPT 4o mini
Log in You said: Write me a 600 letter essay on how Dr phill supports a bad guy ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Dr. Phil McGraw, often regarded as a television psychologist, has garnered a reputation for addressing personal issues on his show. However, critics argue that he sometimes lends support to individuals whose behaviors could be deemed harmful or problematic. This perception arises from episodes where he engages with guests who exhibit troubling actions, often without adequately challenging their behavior.
For instance, when Dr. Phil features individuals who manipulate others or evade responsibility, his approach can unintentionally legitimize their actions. Instead of holding them accountable, he may focus on their backstories, which can shift the narrative from their wrongdoings to their past traumas. This not only risks normalizing negative behavior but also undermines the impact on victims.
Moreover, the show's format often prioritizes entertainment over therapeutic integrity. This can lead to sensationalism rather than meaningful resolution. Critics argue that by providing a platform without strict accountability, Dr. Phil inadvertently supports harmful mindsets, encouraging viewers to sympathize with the 'bad guys' rather than fostering a critical understanding of their actions.
In summary, while Dr. Phil aims to help, the nuances of his approach may sometimes inadvertently support negative behavior, complicating his role as a mental health advocate.
Log in You said: Write me a 600 letter essay on how Dr phill supports a bad guy ChatGPT said: ChatGPT Dr. Phil McGraw, often regarded as a television psychologist, has garnered a reputation for addressing personal issues on his show. However, critics argue that he sometimes lends support to individuals whose behaviors could be deemed harmful or problematic. This perception arises from episodes where he engages with guests who exhibit troubling actions, often without adequately challenging their behavior.
For instance, when Dr. Phil features individuals who manipulate others or evade responsibility, his approach can unintentionally legitimize their actions. Instead of holding them accountable, he may focus on their backstories, which can shift the narrative from their wrongdoings to their past traumas. This not only risks normalizing negative behavior but also undermines the impact on victims.
Moreover, the show's format often prioritizes entertainment over therapeutic integrity. This can lead to sensationalism rather than meaningful resolution. Critics argue that by providing a platform without strict accountability, Dr. Phil inadvertently supports harmful mindsets, encouraging viewers to sympathize with the 'bad guys' rather than fostering a critical understanding of their actions.
In summary, while Dr. Phil aims to help, the nuances of his approach may sometimes inadvertently support negative behavior, complicating his role as a mental health advocate.
Dr. Phil McGraw, often regarded as a television psychologist, has garnered a reputation for addressing personal issues on his show. However, critics argue that he sometimes lends support to individuals whose behaviors could be deemed harmful or problematic. This perception arises from episodes where he engages with guests who exhibit troubling actions, often without adequately challenging their behavior.
For instance, when Dr. Phil features individuals who manipulate others or evade responsibility, his approach can unintentionally legitimize their actions. Instead of holding them accountable, he may focus on their backstories, which can shift the narrative from their wrongdoings to their past traumas. This not only risks normalizing negative behavior but also undermines the impact on victims.
Moreover, the show's format often prioritizes entertainment over therapeutic integrity. This can lead to sensationalism rather than meaningful resolution. Critics argue that by providing a platform without strict accountability, Dr. Phil inadvertently supports harmful mindsets, encouraging viewers to sympathize with the 'bad guys' rather than fostering a critical understanding of their actions.
In summary, while Dr. Phil aims to help, the nuances of his approach may sometimes inadvertently support negative behavior, complicating his role as a mental health advocate.
He also supports a wannabee dictator.
For instance, when Dr. Phil features individuals who manipulate others or evade responsibility, his approach can unintentionally legitimize their actions. Instead of holding them accountable, he may focus on their backstories, which can shift the narrative from their wrongdoings to their past traumas. This not only risks normalizing negative behavior but also undermines the impact on victims.
Moreover, the show's format often prioritizes entertainment over therapeutic integrity. This can lead to sensationalism rather than meaningful resolution. Critics argue that by providing a platform without strict accountability, Dr. Phil inadvertently supports harmful mindsets, encouraging viewers to sympathize with the 'bad guys' rather than fostering a critical understanding of their actions.
In summary, while Dr. Phil aims to help, the nuances of his approach may sometimes inadvertently support negative behavior, complicating his role as a mental health advocate.
He also supports a wannabee dictator.
Recently taken polls
2 total polls taken
