RobertN1
Joined Jan 2018
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews135
RobertN1's rating
Portrait of a Lady on Fire is a historical romantic drama written and directed by Céline Sciamma. The film follows Marianne (portrayed by Noémie Merlant) a painter who is commissioned by The Countess (portrayed by Valeria Golino) to paint of portrait of her daughter, Héloïse (portrayed by Adèle Haenel), for her husband as a wedding present. Héloïse has refused to have other portraits drawn of her as she does not want to be married. Thus, Marianne must draw the portrait in secret under the alias that she was hired to spend time with Héloïse prior to the wedding. During this time, they develop a more close relationship that eventually grows to be romantic.
The film is a really good film. The film itself is beautiful and most scenes look like something you see in an old painting. The acting by Héloïse and Marianne are both really well done and you come to be invested in their relationship.
The reason why the film is rated a bit lower to me than maybe others is that, while all the above is true, it's a bit boring. There is a lot of dialogue and drawn out scenes. If you like romantic period films, this will likely be one of the best ones out. It just isn't my favorite genre of film. Despite that, I can appreciate that it was a very good film that is likely worth the watch even if it does not have re-watch value for me. - 6/10.
The film is a really good film. The film itself is beautiful and most scenes look like something you see in an old painting. The acting by Héloïse and Marianne are both really well done and you come to be invested in their relationship.
The reason why the film is rated a bit lower to me than maybe others is that, while all the above is true, it's a bit boring. There is a lot of dialogue and drawn out scenes. If you like romantic period films, this will likely be one of the best ones out. It just isn't my favorite genre of film. Despite that, I can appreciate that it was a very good film that is likely worth the watch even if it does not have re-watch value for me. - 6/10.
Tigers Are Not Afraid is a fantasy crime horror film directed by Issa López. The film follows two plot lines that do flow together. One plot is that of a group of orphans led by Shine (portrayed by Juan Ramón López) who steal and do whatever they can to survive while staying away from the Cartels. The other plot follows Estrella (portrayed by Paola Lara), a young girl whose mother goes missing and is able to see the ghost of those murdered by the local cartel.
The film is more of a fantasy crime film than a horror film. There are not many horror elements outside of Estrella seeing ghosts and I only was slightly scared from one jump-scare scene in the film (the first time a ghost was shown).
I really enjoyed the underlying story which depicts the forgotten individuals hurt by the Cartels - the orphans of those killed. I thought this was a new portrayal of the issue which was not something I had seen really depicted in this genre of film before. The group of orphans is also well portrayed with Morro (portrayed by Nery Arredondo) being the most likable of the group.
However, I thought the film was a little lacking in the plot line. The Cartel themselves seem a bit too dumb and they are getting outmaneuvered by a group of kids. I would just expect a little more from the gang that controls the local territory. I also don't think the Cartel plot is fully explored. They could've been replaced by just a group of guys and it wouldn't have changed the plot as their ties to the cartel has minimal significance to the overall issue.
Overall, this is a decent fantasy crime film with small elements of horror that is worth the watch although not a stand out film - 6/10.
The film is more of a fantasy crime film than a horror film. There are not many horror elements outside of Estrella seeing ghosts and I only was slightly scared from one jump-scare scene in the film (the first time a ghost was shown).
I really enjoyed the underlying story which depicts the forgotten individuals hurt by the Cartels - the orphans of those killed. I thought this was a new portrayal of the issue which was not something I had seen really depicted in this genre of film before. The group of orphans is also well portrayed with Morro (portrayed by Nery Arredondo) being the most likable of the group.
However, I thought the film was a little lacking in the plot line. The Cartel themselves seem a bit too dumb and they are getting outmaneuvered by a group of kids. I would just expect a little more from the gang that controls the local territory. I also don't think the Cartel plot is fully explored. They could've been replaced by just a group of guys and it wouldn't have changed the plot as their ties to the cartel has minimal significance to the overall issue.
Overall, this is a decent fantasy crime film with small elements of horror that is worth the watch although not a stand out film - 6/10.
Outlaw King is a historical action drama directed by David Mackenzie. The film follows the Scottish King Robert the Bruce (portrayed by Chris Pine) during the Scottish Wars of Independence fought against King Edward I (portrayed by Stephen Dillane) and later his son Prince Edward (portrayed by Billy Howle) from 1304-1307.
The film is a good, albeit not great, historical action film. The battles themselves were well depicted and directed. However, I found the story itself to be a little boring. There is not much character development outside of the battle scenes. You don't learn much of Robert the Bruce's background other than he previously fought King Edward I, lost, and is trying again. James Douglas (portrayed by Aaron Taylor-Johnson) has a pretty important role as Robert's right hand man but also has little character development outside of learning that he seeks his land back. Thus, while I thought the acting and action sequences were well done, the overall plot was a bit underwhelming. - 6/10.
The film is a good, albeit not great, historical action film. The battles themselves were well depicted and directed. However, I found the story itself to be a little boring. There is not much character development outside of the battle scenes. You don't learn much of Robert the Bruce's background other than he previously fought King Edward I, lost, and is trying again. James Douglas (portrayed by Aaron Taylor-Johnson) has a pretty important role as Robert's right hand man but also has little character development outside of learning that he seeks his land back. Thus, while I thought the acting and action sequences were well done, the overall plot was a bit underwhelming. - 6/10.