seventhgradeatwood

'The Loud House' is a very unique show, managing to show a new light on classic imagery, and sometimes on strict beliefs and views, without losing the identity of a kid-friendly show, making not only children laugh, but can also amuse teens and adults. However, it does not fall short on the storytelling front, and can deliver a good message, alongside with it's good humor and quality traits.

The show is filled with charming characters, which paired with excellent voice acting makes for someone you can actually root for, and feel both the pain and joy that the character experiences as well. With the plots, 'The Loud House' is able to take basic or suggestive themes and turn it into a humorous, colorful and moving story that can not be called a rip-off of another story or basic plotline.

Any suggestions? Mostly those bits and pieces that will make those older viewers uncomfortable or cringe inside, i.e. potty humor, are things that annoy me, and most definitely annoy others. However, it is never-the-less a good show and I recommend it to watch if you are looking for a good source of entertainment.

Boasting extraordinary acting, an interesting plot, phenomenal musical scores, realistic CGI, impressive props, amazing locations and good directing, "The Fellowship of the Ring" starts off Tolkien's fantastic story about a quest to destroy an all-powerful ring to a brilliant start.

Now, when I heard that this show was going to be directed by Dan Schneider, I immediately gave up any chance of the show having some decency.

Now, with the hilarious exception of "Drake & Josh", all of Dan Schneider's works have been unfunny, uninteresting, and often uncreative, boasting horrendous acting and plastic humor to go along with it. Anyone who watches any of his shows outside of the targeted age group will be guaranteed to lose a few brain cells.

"Henry Danger" was not an exception. With unbelievable characters, ridiculous plots (even for a story about a superhero and his sidekick), and not to mention boring action sequences (whenever they do happen), the "Henry Danger" show is destined to become a forgotten show that society should do without.

When I heard that "The Adventures of Kid Danger" was going to be animated, I thought that Dan Schneider would get his chance to make something good since "Drake & Josh"... or, at least it would be marginally better than "Henry Danger". However, I can now decide that this show is majorly worse.

The characters are not only unbelievable, but also so annoying it isn't funny. The action sequences are just as unimpressive, but I can give a point to "Henry Danger" for actually having real people in the shoots. And the humor... it has immediately gone downhill to stupidity and slapstick.

As my final note, I do NOT recommend anyone to watch this, unless if they wish to perhaps (possibly) find a decent episodes among Dan Schneider's works, for there usually is.