innat-40104

I've come to a personal realization about anime ratings: just because an anime is highly rated doesn't automatically mean it's a high-quality piece of art. Popularity can be loud, hype can be overwhelming, and fan scores can be inflated for reasons that have nothing to do with narrative depth or genuine craftsmanship. A show can be praised everywhere, dominate charts, and still feel completely unimpressive or even downright trash when you watch it for yourself. For me, One Punch Man is the clearest example of this disconnect.

Despite its massive popularity and constant praise, most of One Punch Man failed to hold my interest. The humor felt repetitive, the pacing uneven, and the constant reliance on the same overpowered joke quickly became predictable. What was meant to be funny or clever often came off as loud and irritating instead. Many of the action sequences lacked emotional weight, and the overall storytelling felt shallow, relying more on spectacle than substance. As a result, large portions of the show felt boring to sit through, almost like I was waiting for something meaningful to finally happen but it rarely did.

The one exception, the only part that genuinely drew me in, was Garou's arc in Season 2. His character brought a sense of tension and complexity the show desperately needed. His motivations were interesting, his ideology added depth, and his fights were dynamic and engaging in a way the rest of the series simply wasn't. Whenever Garou was on screen, the show felt alive. He carried the entire season for me, providing the only moments that were truly enjoyable.

But apart from Garou's storyline, One Punch Man felt disappointing. It reminded me that high ratings don't guarantee high artistry and that sometimes, even the most beloved shows can feel empty once you look past the hype.

A very beautiful piece of work. Decode the ere is such a great way to explain someone like this. Great Work.