markadmoore
Joined May 2018
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews25
markadmoore's rating
... this BAD in 1995?
DO NOT WATCH this piece of nonsense. I'm asking because I was there and I can't remember seeing anything like this! Perhaps I was lucky, until now. I mean, we had Seven and Die Hard and Bond and HEAT and Just Cause and 12 Monkeys and THIS piece of trash has somehow managed 5.6 on IMDb??? You must be joking!
I repeat: DO NOT WATCH or waste you time, as I have just done ...
DO NOT WATCH this piece of nonsense. I'm asking because I was there and I can't remember seeing anything like this! Perhaps I was lucky, until now. I mean, we had Seven and Die Hard and Bond and HEAT and Just Cause and 12 Monkeys and THIS piece of trash has somehow managed 5.6 on IMDb??? You must be joking!
I repeat: DO NOT WATCH or waste you time, as I have just done ...
... doesn't quite manage bring the whole show done to 'over-acting school', level, thanks to the generally higher standard of most of the rest of the cast, but she does her best to. The show fluctuates between interesting, even clever, to the absurd ( Bruce Lee would be little more than a punching bag for Jennifer ). You might get hooked on the 'What happens next' hook approach but you'll also find yourself shaking your head in disbelief and/or confusion. To stay the course, or not, you'll probably decide by halfway through season 1. Oh! And you'll probably hate the director's idea of having two actors screaming simultaneously in each other's faces, because, after all that's exactly what you'd expect Te'o senior CIA agents to do when their points of view differ.
No, sorry! It's dreadful!
There are no genuine 'actors'. Arnie at his early worst, was still Arnie - definitely no Arnies here. The 'action' is second rate and very poorly choregraphed. The script? Oh! Dear!
How it has a score of 7, I have no idea.
They tell you the story upfront, not that you need any help working it out - predictable, because it's been done, redone and done again.
The so-called awards and nominations? Have a look at the entities that issued them - 'nough said!
Don't believe me? Suit yourself - watch it but don't say that I didn't warn you! Not that I'd hear you anyway, I'm going to be outside checking on my grass ...
There are no genuine 'actors'. Arnie at his early worst, was still Arnie - definitely no Arnies here. The 'action' is second rate and very poorly choregraphed. The script? Oh! Dear!
How it has a score of 7, I have no idea.
They tell you the story upfront, not that you need any help working it out - predictable, because it's been done, redone and done again.
The so-called awards and nominations? Have a look at the entities that issued them - 'nough said!
Don't believe me? Suit yourself - watch it but don't say that I didn't warn you! Not that I'd hear you anyway, I'm going to be outside checking on my grass ...
Recently taken polls
1 total poll taken