audgeml
Joined Aug 2018
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews10
audgeml's rating
Would be a better movie , Adams miscast as lead
The story and supporting cast is pretty good
Rachel McAdams is not funny and tries too hard to be funny
A more quirky funny actress would have worked like a Jennifer Gardner type.
Would be a better movie , Adams miscast as lead The story and supporting cast is pretty good Rachel McAdams is not funny and tries too hard to be funny A more quirky funny actress would have worked like a Jennifer Gardner type.
Would be a better movie , Adams miscast as lead The story and supporting cast is pretty good Rachel McAdams is not funny and tries too hard to be funny A more quirky funny actress would have worked like a Jennifer Gardner type.
Would be a better movie , Adams miscast as lead The story and supporting cast is pretty good Rachel McAdams is not funny and tries too hard to be funny A more quirky funny actress would have worked like a Jennifer Gardner type.
Would be a better movie , Adams miscast as lead The story and supporting cast is pretty good Rachel McAdams is not funny and tries too hard to be funny A more quirky funny actress would have worked like a Jennifer Gardner type.
Would be a better movie , Adams miscast as lead The story and supporting cast is pretty good Rachel McAdams is not funny and tries too hard to be funny A more quirky funny actress would have worked like a Jennifer Gardner type.
Would be a better movie , Adams miscast as lead The story and supporting cast is pretty good Rachel McAdams is not funny and tries too hard to be funny A more quirky funny actress would have worked like a Jennifer Gardner type.
Beautiful movie, visually appealing.
A little too long to get to the point. But well-acted mainly Bergman.
Bergman's character at times felt intelligent but silly at the same time.
Would she really go through all this trouble if he wasn't cute?
Hitchcock did his best with the material. Plus the Dali sequence both top-notch.
A little too long to get to the point. But well-acted mainly Bergman.
Bergman's character at times felt intelligent but silly at the same time.
Would she really go through all this trouble if he wasn't cute?
Hitchcock did his best with the material. Plus the Dali sequence both top-notch.
Oh goodness, another stupid idiotic woman!
She also a bad actress so it makes it worse.
I give this episode 7 out of 10 rating.
Still worth watching as the story has potential and Patrick McGoohan saves the episode from being a total bore.
Oh goodness, another stupid idiotic woman!
She also a bad actress so it makes it worse.
I give this episode 7 out of 10 rating.
Still worth watching as the story has potential and Patrick McGoohan saves the episode from being a total bore.
Oh goodness, another stupid idiotic woman!
She also a bad actress so it makes it worse.
I give this episode 7 out of 10 rating.
Still worth watching as the story has potential and Patrick McGoohan saves the episode from being a total bore.
She also a bad actress so it makes it worse.
I give this episode 7 out of 10 rating.
Still worth watching as the story has potential and Patrick McGoohan saves the episode from being a total bore.
Oh goodness, another stupid idiotic woman!
She also a bad actress so it makes it worse.
I give this episode 7 out of 10 rating.
Still worth watching as the story has potential and Patrick McGoohan saves the episode from being a total bore.
Oh goodness, another stupid idiotic woman!
She also a bad actress so it makes it worse.
I give this episode 7 out of 10 rating.
Still worth watching as the story has potential and Patrick McGoohan saves the episode from being a total bore.