moviefest-90757
Joined Aug 2018
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings72
moviefest-90757's rating
Reviews59
moviefest-90757's rating
There's a moment midway through "Milk, Rice, and the Blood" where nothing is said, but everything is understood. It's not a dramatic reveal or a stylistic flourish. It's just a man standing still, surrounded by the aftermath of a decision. That stillness - not the violence, not the backstory - is the centre of this film.
Saurabh Doke's directorial effort is lean, unadorned, and unapologetically focused. At just 45 minutes, the film offers no detours. We follow Siddharth, a man newly arrived in the city to find out what happened to his brother, Pradip - a kind, principled Dalit man whose sense of decency seems to have marked him for destruction. The story unfolds in fragments: present-tense confrontation interspersed with flashbacks that quietly reframe what we thought we understood.
Doke, who also plays Siddharth, refuses to perform emotion in a way that seeks our approval. There's no speechifying, no manufactured moment of epiphany. Instead, his choices as an actor mirror the film's choices as a whole - minimal, direct, and withholding. The restraint works. Because when the film eventually shows us what happened to Pradip, the absence of sentiment makes it hit harder.
"Milk, Rice, and the Blood" doesn't brand itself as an issue film, and that's to its credit. It doesn't moralise, doesn't offer an outsider's view of caste violence as something exotic or theatrical. Instead, it keeps its focus tight - a brother searching, discovering, reacting. And through that simplicity, it sidesteps what so many others get wrong: the need to explain everything. Here, things just are. And it's precisely that matter-of-fact tone that gives the film its quiet authority.
The revenge-thriller format is familiar, but Doke uses it as scaffolding rather than a blueprint. The usual mechanics - discovery, escalation, confrontation - are all present, but they feel subdued, more observational than engineered. There's no climactic release. Just consequences.
Technically, the film is functional rather than flashy. The cinematography serves the story rather than calling attention to itself, and that's the right choice. Nothing about this world is heightened. This is not a revenge fantasy. It's a slow erosion. And what makes it unsettling is that Siddharth, even at his most violent, never feels heroic. He's efficient. Controlled. But not free.
In the end, "Milk, Rice, and the Blood" doesn't ask you to admire anyone. It doesn't ask you to condemn either. It simply puts you in the room - with Siddharth, with Pradip, with the people who watched and said nothing - and lets you decide how you feel about what's just happened.
Some films demand attention through scale or spectacle. This one does it by refusing to look away.
Saurabh Doke's directorial effort is lean, unadorned, and unapologetically focused. At just 45 minutes, the film offers no detours. We follow Siddharth, a man newly arrived in the city to find out what happened to his brother, Pradip - a kind, principled Dalit man whose sense of decency seems to have marked him for destruction. The story unfolds in fragments: present-tense confrontation interspersed with flashbacks that quietly reframe what we thought we understood.
Doke, who also plays Siddharth, refuses to perform emotion in a way that seeks our approval. There's no speechifying, no manufactured moment of epiphany. Instead, his choices as an actor mirror the film's choices as a whole - minimal, direct, and withholding. The restraint works. Because when the film eventually shows us what happened to Pradip, the absence of sentiment makes it hit harder.
"Milk, Rice, and the Blood" doesn't brand itself as an issue film, and that's to its credit. It doesn't moralise, doesn't offer an outsider's view of caste violence as something exotic or theatrical. Instead, it keeps its focus tight - a brother searching, discovering, reacting. And through that simplicity, it sidesteps what so many others get wrong: the need to explain everything. Here, things just are. And it's precisely that matter-of-fact tone that gives the film its quiet authority.
The revenge-thriller format is familiar, but Doke uses it as scaffolding rather than a blueprint. The usual mechanics - discovery, escalation, confrontation - are all present, but they feel subdued, more observational than engineered. There's no climactic release. Just consequences.
Technically, the film is functional rather than flashy. The cinematography serves the story rather than calling attention to itself, and that's the right choice. Nothing about this world is heightened. This is not a revenge fantasy. It's a slow erosion. And what makes it unsettling is that Siddharth, even at his most violent, never feels heroic. He's efficient. Controlled. But not free.
In the end, "Milk, Rice, and the Blood" doesn't ask you to admire anyone. It doesn't ask you to condemn either. It simply puts you in the room - with Siddharth, with Pradip, with the people who watched and said nothing - and lets you decide how you feel about what's just happened.
Some films demand attention through scale or spectacle. This one does it by refusing to look away.
In just nine taut minutes, Brian Ferenchik's "Wide Open" delivers a sharp, disquieting meditation on modern masculinity and the illusion of safety in both relationships and domestic space. With the sleek minimalism of a luxury home and the lurking dread of a home invasion thriller, the film becomes a haunting psychological crucible-where trust is weaponised and vulnerability laid bare.
The premise is deceptively simple. Sean and Camilla, a young couple hoping to escape the criminal chaos of Los Angeles, retreat to a pristine Hollywood Hills hideaway. What unfolds, however, is not a relaxing weekend, but a carefully orchestrated psychological test. Ferenchik masterfully sets the scene: a serene evening of tenderness and routine, until Camilla's offhand question-"What would you do if someone broke into our house?"-becomes the chilling fuse.
When the masked intruder arrives, the shift from quiet domesticity to survival mode is immediate and visceral. Yet the violence is not gratuitous. Instead, the tension builds with surgical precision, assisted by a coldly effective synth score that thrums with paranoia. The visuals, steeped in polished surfaces and angular shadows, evoke both security and sterility-a home that is beautiful but ultimately hollow.
The film's most striking moment arrives with the reveal: Camilla orchestrated the break-in, testing Sean's mettle, her judgment of his masculinity hanging in the balance. It's a scene that could easily have tilted into absurdity, but Ferenchik grounds it with unnerving clarity. Her calm line-"Do you take Venmo?"-lands like a gut punch, not just for Sean but for the viewer. It exposes a generational anxiety: the commodification of protection, the transactional nature of emotional validation, and the uneasy collapse of gender expectations in intimate partnerships.
What "Wide Open" does so effectively is subvert the traditional home invasion trope. The enemy isn't really outside-it's already inside, nested in unspoken doubts and power dynamics. The real break-in is emotional, psychological. It's a study of how fear-of failure, of inadequacy, of not living up to a prescribed role-can be as destabilising as any physical threat.
Ferenchik's direction is confident, restrained, and ultimately provocative. He doesn't spell out the answers but instead asks uncomfortable questions. Is masculinity performative? Is love conditional on protection? And in a world where danger feels omnipresent, can we ever truly feel safe-either in our homes or in each other?
In the end, "Wide Open" is less about a break-in and more about a breakdown-of expectations, of trust, of roles that no longer fit. It's a smart, stylish thriller that lingers well beyond its runtime, inviting introspection long after the final frame.
The premise is deceptively simple. Sean and Camilla, a young couple hoping to escape the criminal chaos of Los Angeles, retreat to a pristine Hollywood Hills hideaway. What unfolds, however, is not a relaxing weekend, but a carefully orchestrated psychological test. Ferenchik masterfully sets the scene: a serene evening of tenderness and routine, until Camilla's offhand question-"What would you do if someone broke into our house?"-becomes the chilling fuse.
When the masked intruder arrives, the shift from quiet domesticity to survival mode is immediate and visceral. Yet the violence is not gratuitous. Instead, the tension builds with surgical precision, assisted by a coldly effective synth score that thrums with paranoia. The visuals, steeped in polished surfaces and angular shadows, evoke both security and sterility-a home that is beautiful but ultimately hollow.
The film's most striking moment arrives with the reveal: Camilla orchestrated the break-in, testing Sean's mettle, her judgment of his masculinity hanging in the balance. It's a scene that could easily have tilted into absurdity, but Ferenchik grounds it with unnerving clarity. Her calm line-"Do you take Venmo?"-lands like a gut punch, not just for Sean but for the viewer. It exposes a generational anxiety: the commodification of protection, the transactional nature of emotional validation, and the uneasy collapse of gender expectations in intimate partnerships.
What "Wide Open" does so effectively is subvert the traditional home invasion trope. The enemy isn't really outside-it's already inside, nested in unspoken doubts and power dynamics. The real break-in is emotional, psychological. It's a study of how fear-of failure, of inadequacy, of not living up to a prescribed role-can be as destabilising as any physical threat.
Ferenchik's direction is confident, restrained, and ultimately provocative. He doesn't spell out the answers but instead asks uncomfortable questions. Is masculinity performative? Is love conditional on protection? And in a world where danger feels omnipresent, can we ever truly feel safe-either in our homes or in each other?
In the end, "Wide Open" is less about a break-in and more about a breakdown-of expectations, of trust, of roles that no longer fit. It's a smart, stylish thriller that lingers well beyond its runtime, inviting introspection long after the final frame.
Bryan Enk's "Beneath the Sea It Sings" is an eerie fever dream whispered through time, a ghost story that unspools like an incantation, pulling you deeper into its spectral grip with each passing second. A short film that transcends its modest runtime, it is both a chilling maritime folktale and an intimate descent into madness, anchored by a singularly mesmerizing performance from Julia Kolinski.
From the outset, Enk establishes a world that feels suspended in time, drenched in shadows and brine. The film's opening moments are steeped in sensory detail-the groan of wooden planks, the distant lapping of waves, the weight of unseen horrors pressing in from all sides. We find our protagonist bound in a dimly lit chamber, her surroundings suffused with an almost dreamlike stillness. And then she speaks. Directly to us.
Kolinski's performance is a tour de force of escalating dread. Her wide-eyed delivery oscillates between fractured recollection and barely contained hysteria, painting a picture of a crew lured to their doom by a song too beautiful to resist. It's a classic tale of fatal temptation-sailors entranced by a melody drifting across the water, the siren call of something ancient and unfathomable. And yet, the film's true horror isn't just in what is described, but in the way it is told. Every hesitation, every shudder, every haunted glance speaks to an experience too terrible to fully articulate.
The visual language of "Beneath the Sea It Sings" is strikingly precise, with Christiaan Koop's production design and Jon Weiner's editing working in tandem to create a sense of creeping inevitability. The film doesn't rely on abrupt shocks but instead lets its atmosphere sink into you, tightening its grip like salt air clinging to the skin. Weiner's use of sound is particularly effective, layering diegetic and non-diegetic elements to blur the lines between memory and reality. The melody itself-crafted with sinister elegance by Nick Olman-is a masterstroke, a tune that feels at once melancholic and menacing, as though it carries the weight of every soul it has ever ensnared.
Enk's direction is meticulous, never overplaying his hand. He understands that true horror isn't just about what is seen or even heard, but what lingers-what follows you long after the final frame. This is a film that refuses to dissipate like mist at sunrise. Instead, it burrows, settling into that quiet part of the mind where unease festers. By the time the credits roll, we are left not with the satisfaction of resolution, but with the gnawing sense that the melody has found its way into us, too.
At just twelve minutes, "Beneath the Sea It Sings" is a triumph of restrained horror-a beautifully crafted piece of nightmare fuel that lures you in, just as the ill-fated crew once was. Enk, Kolinski, and their team have conjured something rare: a short film that feels as boundless as the ocean itself, stretching beyond its running time to haunt the imagination long after the screen fades to black.
From the outset, Enk establishes a world that feels suspended in time, drenched in shadows and brine. The film's opening moments are steeped in sensory detail-the groan of wooden planks, the distant lapping of waves, the weight of unseen horrors pressing in from all sides. We find our protagonist bound in a dimly lit chamber, her surroundings suffused with an almost dreamlike stillness. And then she speaks. Directly to us.
Kolinski's performance is a tour de force of escalating dread. Her wide-eyed delivery oscillates between fractured recollection and barely contained hysteria, painting a picture of a crew lured to their doom by a song too beautiful to resist. It's a classic tale of fatal temptation-sailors entranced by a melody drifting across the water, the siren call of something ancient and unfathomable. And yet, the film's true horror isn't just in what is described, but in the way it is told. Every hesitation, every shudder, every haunted glance speaks to an experience too terrible to fully articulate.
The visual language of "Beneath the Sea It Sings" is strikingly precise, with Christiaan Koop's production design and Jon Weiner's editing working in tandem to create a sense of creeping inevitability. The film doesn't rely on abrupt shocks but instead lets its atmosphere sink into you, tightening its grip like salt air clinging to the skin. Weiner's use of sound is particularly effective, layering diegetic and non-diegetic elements to blur the lines between memory and reality. The melody itself-crafted with sinister elegance by Nick Olman-is a masterstroke, a tune that feels at once melancholic and menacing, as though it carries the weight of every soul it has ever ensnared.
Enk's direction is meticulous, never overplaying his hand. He understands that true horror isn't just about what is seen or even heard, but what lingers-what follows you long after the final frame. This is a film that refuses to dissipate like mist at sunrise. Instead, it burrows, settling into that quiet part of the mind where unease festers. By the time the credits roll, we are left not with the satisfaction of resolution, but with the gnawing sense that the melody has found its way into us, too.
At just twelve minutes, "Beneath the Sea It Sings" is a triumph of restrained horror-a beautifully crafted piece of nightmare fuel that lures you in, just as the ill-fated crew once was. Enk, Kolinski, and their team have conjured something rare: a short film that feels as boundless as the ocean itself, stretching beyond its running time to haunt the imagination long after the screen fades to black.