jim-j-moore
Joined Apr 2006
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings36
jim-j-moore's rating
Reviews24
jim-j-moore's rating
The main problem with this movie is not the protagonist or the subject matter.
It's the shaky, out of focus "handycam" footage shot on a potato camera that is, frankly, way worse than numerous YouTube bodycam uploads. I'm not expecting someone to be standing up in a firefight with a camera on a tripod but this is just unwatchable. And when the camera does stop swinging around wildly, you get a mixture of sky, earth, thigh, ear, and all in low res. Oh and the odd bit of stock news footage.
You would be be off with the audiobook version! :) lol.
It's the shaky, out of focus "handycam" footage shot on a potato camera that is, frankly, way worse than numerous YouTube bodycam uploads. I'm not expecting someone to be standing up in a firefight with a camera on a tripod but this is just unwatchable. And when the camera does stop swinging around wildly, you get a mixture of sky, earth, thigh, ear, and all in low res. Oh and the odd bit of stock news footage.
You would be be off with the audiobook version! :) lol.
It's hard to decide what rating to assign to this Kickstarter-funded Star Trek fan film. The fact that it's been done on an absolute shoe-string budget by commercial Hollywood standards plus that the crew and cast are amateurs means that one is inclined to be generous with the critique.
However, a movie deserves an honest review no matter who made it and I wouldn't want to be generous to the point of patronising.
Given the humble resources from which it was created, this is really quite a good film. Okay yes, the acting is a little awkward and the dialogue a bit stilted. But lest we forget, some of the original Star Trek cast were a bit hammy (I'm looking at you, Shatner). It also has a tiny cast, so you don't really get the sense of Starfleet...more a sort of Starsquad. Overall, though, it's a huge leap forward from earlier fan film efforts.
Unsurprisingly, the film relies heavily on CGI just like its commercial cousins. What is surprising is that it's mostly quite well done, especially the spacecraft. Mostly.
By far, by a veritable country mile, the worst thing about this movie is that it's absolutely saturated with lens flares and an almost constant soft-focus haze - perhaps to help disguise the imperfections in the background CGI or scenery? From what I could tell in the few scenes where the blur and lens flares weren't dialled up to eleven, it still looked okay so I really think it was a mistake to go so overboard with the visual distortions.
This is especially unfortunate because this movie almost...almost...had me suspending belief and becoming immersed but the god-awful continued glare and flare visual overlays just kept breaking the mood.
Final verdict? A flawed but nonetheless very impressive fan film. I doff my hat to Tommy Kraft, his cast and crew.
However, a movie deserves an honest review no matter who made it and I wouldn't want to be generous to the point of patronising.
Given the humble resources from which it was created, this is really quite a good film. Okay yes, the acting is a little awkward and the dialogue a bit stilted. But lest we forget, some of the original Star Trek cast were a bit hammy (I'm looking at you, Shatner). It also has a tiny cast, so you don't really get the sense of Starfleet...more a sort of Starsquad. Overall, though, it's a huge leap forward from earlier fan film efforts.
Unsurprisingly, the film relies heavily on CGI just like its commercial cousins. What is surprising is that it's mostly quite well done, especially the spacecraft. Mostly.
By far, by a veritable country mile, the worst thing about this movie is that it's absolutely saturated with lens flares and an almost constant soft-focus haze - perhaps to help disguise the imperfections in the background CGI or scenery? From what I could tell in the few scenes where the blur and lens flares weren't dialled up to eleven, it still looked okay so I really think it was a mistake to go so overboard with the visual distortions.
This is especially unfortunate because this movie almost...almost...had me suspending belief and becoming immersed but the god-awful continued glare and flare visual overlays just kept breaking the mood.
Final verdict? A flawed but nonetheless very impressive fan film. I doff my hat to Tommy Kraft, his cast and crew.
I hadn't heard of this movie but the short synopsis and the inclusion of two respected actors, Kevin Bacon and Djimon Hounsou, persuaded me to watch it.
Oh wow, it was embarrassingly bad.
The acting was a 'B' movie standard throughout by the predominantly Thai cast, with Bacon and Hounsou struggling to raise the bar. The storyline was clumsily sequenced, not helped by dubious editing, staggering from scene to scene with absolutely zero character development whatsoever.
The film was so poor that my girlfriend ended up playing Candy Crush while I contemplated the bowel movement that I was going to enjoy after the closing credits rolled.
Oh wow, it was embarrassingly bad.
The acting was a 'B' movie standard throughout by the predominantly Thai cast, with Bacon and Hounsou struggling to raise the bar. The storyline was clumsily sequenced, not helped by dubious editing, staggering from scene to scene with absolutely zero character development whatsoever.
The film was so poor that my girlfriend ended up playing Candy Crush while I contemplated the bowel movement that I was going to enjoy after the closing credits rolled.