nath_j_h
Joined Jun 2006
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews21
nath_j_h's rating
Lets face it, with these sort of low budget horror flicks you can't expect a lot from them. one thing you can almost be certain of with low budgeters, is that the films will be littered with can't - act teens or failures, but don't get me wrong some low budgets turn out OK like Wolf Creek for example where a tiny $1,000,000 was spent, the more expensive horrors these days can be as much as $50,000,000 and more.
In House Of The Dead 2's case, it didn't turn out OK. The acting was poor, the plot was simple and fairly silly, it was quite boring to watch and how many careless people can die from some brainless zombies?? The film was almost childish. I wish i could give some credit to the film but i am finding it hard to, the gore wasn't even that good! waste of my time ! - 3/10
In House Of The Dead 2's case, it didn't turn out OK. The acting was poor, the plot was simple and fairly silly, it was quite boring to watch and how many careless people can die from some brainless zombies?? The film was almost childish. I wish i could give some credit to the film but i am finding it hard to, the gore wasn't even that good! waste of my time ! - 3/10
I have to say i didn't enjoy this film as much as the first. The film does have some good 'jumpy' scenes that either gets your heart pumping or makes you jump a little but the plot is too weak.
The film doesn't seem to have a good solid plot, it seems to jump about and wonder around and you sometimes wonder what its all about.
The film does show a little gore, but not a lot so don't expect much, as its the usual grudge performance, a case of scary faces and spooky music.
the top and bottom of the film is: some fairly good scary scenes, but a weak and jumpy plot that could have been better, wheres a movie without a good plot? - 5/10
The film doesn't seem to have a good solid plot, it seems to jump about and wonder around and you sometimes wonder what its all about.
The film does show a little gore, but not a lot so don't expect much, as its the usual grudge performance, a case of scary faces and spooky music.
the top and bottom of the film is: some fairly good scary scenes, but a weak and jumpy plot that could have been better, wheres a movie without a good plot? - 5/10
Downtown wouldn't have been a personal choice but i was lent it with some other movies so I watched it. I understood that Forest Whitaker was in downtown (actor of recent film The Last King Of Scotland) The film turned out to be quite reasonable, co-star Anthony Edwards was actually quite funny at times making the film that little bit better, and not forgetting the soundtracks that make a good film.
The film included shooting scenes, car chase scenes, and a bit of comedy splashed in for good measure.Forest Whitaker played a fairly good part and is a decent actor, the problem with films these day is that 90% of them are swarming with new/fresh from drama school teens, we need to hang on to our good actors.
overall, a good cop flick worth the 90 min. - 7/10
The film included shooting scenes, car chase scenes, and a bit of comedy splashed in for good measure.Forest Whitaker played a fairly good part and is a decent actor, the problem with films these day is that 90% of them are swarming with new/fresh from drama school teens, we need to hang on to our good actors.
overall, a good cop flick worth the 90 min. - 7/10