movie-man-2

Flynn comes from a school of filmmakers that prefer minimal authorial signatures, from the writing through to the mise en scene. I think there has been confusion between his 'banal direction' offered by some commentators, which I disagree with, and his excellent use of location and space within the frame. He allows the drama to rise and fall through performance and action without imposition, like Sturges. This reserved manner is sometimes confused with the jobbing work of so much TV drama, but is markedly more studied and worked through. Rolling Thunder is of the same pedigree although Schrader dismissed it. Flynn was very capable of nudging audience response in a mature manner and not grandstanding his direction for the sake of posturing.

I've watched this film over and over. There is perfection in it's brevity, assuredness in performance, outrageous make up, good costumes, peculiarly effective non-classical western camera-work and Burt! Perhaps one day I will write that piece on Burt's political stance demonstrated in his movies, but for now will add my name to the list of Valdez supporters. I particularly admire the taut structure and tone, the minimal but highly emotional exchanges between the players and the curious fact that none of the Mexicans are played by - Mexicans. I do not agree with the associations made by some commentators about the Leone connection. This film came from a completely different camp. This is Lancaster territory not Leone's. I would love to talk to Edwin Sherin about this film or any of the surviving cast and crew. Any offers?