fung0
Joined Aug 2006
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings537
fung0's rating
Reviews258
fung0's rating
Two ageing actors sitting in the garden gabbing about old times, about careers, about personal aspirations and about friendship. Is this the recipe for a great viewing experience? In this case, very much so - on three counts.
1. The obvious reason to watch Mind Meld is for the Star Trek anecdotes. These include some truly amazing glimpses behind the screen, into the day to day work of creating a TV show in 1960s Hollywood. The yarns are often hilarious, but they also work to deepen one's admiration for (at the time) relatively unknown actors giving their all to a show that many would see as lightweight or silly.
2. The second reason to watch Mind Meld is to learn a bit about the personal lives of two of the world's most recognizable celebrities. To see them as they see themselves, and to see life as it looks to individuals like them, who have, as Nimoy says, "made it." To hear them talk honestly about love, life, and death, and their ongoing search for meaning and fulfillment.
3. But the HUGE bonus is seeing two old friends letting down their guard in front of a camera, opening up to each other (and us) about their dreams, their ordinary human trials... and ultimately expressing their huge affection for each other.
I can't think of another documentary at once so simple, yet so moving. Even if you care nothing about Star Trek, or these particular actors, Mind Meld remains a unique snapshot of two ordinary people, looking back from middle age. Unless you're made of neutronium, you *will* experience tears of both laughter and joy - possibly at the same time.
1. The obvious reason to watch Mind Meld is for the Star Trek anecdotes. These include some truly amazing glimpses behind the screen, into the day to day work of creating a TV show in 1960s Hollywood. The yarns are often hilarious, but they also work to deepen one's admiration for (at the time) relatively unknown actors giving their all to a show that many would see as lightweight or silly.
2. The second reason to watch Mind Meld is to learn a bit about the personal lives of two of the world's most recognizable celebrities. To see them as they see themselves, and to see life as it looks to individuals like them, who have, as Nimoy says, "made it." To hear them talk honestly about love, life, and death, and their ongoing search for meaning and fulfillment.
3. But the HUGE bonus is seeing two old friends letting down their guard in front of a camera, opening up to each other (and us) about their dreams, their ordinary human trials... and ultimately expressing their huge affection for each other.
I can't think of another documentary at once so simple, yet so moving. Even if you care nothing about Star Trek, or these particular actors, Mind Meld remains a unique snapshot of two ordinary people, looking back from middle age. Unless you're made of neutronium, you *will* experience tears of both laughter and joy - possibly at the same time.
This new version of Red Sonja is what might once have been called a 'B' movie. It's not shot for IMAX, and it doesn't have any big-name stars. But it's a pretty darn good movie in every way that counts.
1. Matilda Lutz (Zone 414) does a great job of portraying the eponymous heroine. Smart decision, getting a lady who can act, as opposed to some physically magnificent mannequin. Lutz is feisty, wiry and quick enough to be believable in the fight scenes.
Also excellent is Robert Sheehan (Umbrella Academy) as the villain. He plays someone you really want to hate, but also sympathize with in some ways. That's a lot more depth than you'd find in most big-budget badguys.
2. The script is rather good. There are a few clunky lines, but overall the dialog is full of pleasant surprises. Several of the one-liners made me laugh in spite of myself. Sonja's exchange with the armorer is a particularly hilarious send-up of sexist fantasy tropes. Also, it's odd that 'Vihur' (or more properly, 'wichur') means 'strong wind' or 'gale' in Polish - great name for a horse.
More importantly, many situations work out very differently than one might expect - especially the ending. The formula may be familiar, but the embellishments make it feel fresh.
3. Production does show some limitations of budget, but is actually quite impressive overall. The CG is imaginative, especially the cyclops. Outdoor vistas are beautiful.
One other point in favor of Red Sonja: the director is 'MJ Bassett' - the same one who directed another really worthwhile Robert E Howard adaptation 16 years ago - Solomon Kane. He clearly has a feel for this material.
Red Sonja is yet another one of those bottom-rated movies that entertained me from end to end. It reminded me strongly of the wonderful 1950s fantasy films of Ray Harryhausen - not lacking imperfections, yet visually appealing and generally great fun.
If you like fantasy-swashbucklers at all, and don't instantly dismiss lower-budget productions for their few rough edges, do ignore the nit-pickers and see Red Sonja ASAP.
1. Matilda Lutz (Zone 414) does a great job of portraying the eponymous heroine. Smart decision, getting a lady who can act, as opposed to some physically magnificent mannequin. Lutz is feisty, wiry and quick enough to be believable in the fight scenes.
Also excellent is Robert Sheehan (Umbrella Academy) as the villain. He plays someone you really want to hate, but also sympathize with in some ways. That's a lot more depth than you'd find in most big-budget badguys.
2. The script is rather good. There are a few clunky lines, but overall the dialog is full of pleasant surprises. Several of the one-liners made me laugh in spite of myself. Sonja's exchange with the armorer is a particularly hilarious send-up of sexist fantasy tropes. Also, it's odd that 'Vihur' (or more properly, 'wichur') means 'strong wind' or 'gale' in Polish - great name for a horse.
More importantly, many situations work out very differently than one might expect - especially the ending. The formula may be familiar, but the embellishments make it feel fresh.
3. Production does show some limitations of budget, but is actually quite impressive overall. The CG is imaginative, especially the cyclops. Outdoor vistas are beautiful.
One other point in favor of Red Sonja: the director is 'MJ Bassett' - the same one who directed another really worthwhile Robert E Howard adaptation 16 years ago - Solomon Kane. He clearly has a feel for this material.
Red Sonja is yet another one of those bottom-rated movies that entertained me from end to end. It reminded me strongly of the wonderful 1950s fantasy films of Ray Harryhausen - not lacking imperfections, yet visually appealing and generally great fun.
If you like fantasy-swashbucklers at all, and don't instantly dismiss lower-budget productions for their few rough edges, do ignore the nit-pickers and see Red Sonja ASAP.
As a huge fan of Fred MacMurray, I was delighted to discover this rare early film. Alas, delight quickly turned to disappointment. "Exclusive" is a peculiar little potboiler, with little to recommend it other than its two stars, MacMurray and Frances Farmer.
Things start out innocently enough, with MacMurray as the crusading editor of a local newspaper, aiming to expose a gangster - Lloyd Nolan doing what he does best. The gangster cleverly ups the ante by buying a rival newspaper to promote his own version of reality. And to top it off, he even hires MacMurray's girl, played by Frances Farmer, to be his star reporter.
As if that's not galling enough, under Nolan's tutelage Farmer inexplicably - and very implausibly - turns full-on evil, churning out muck-raking stories with wild abandon. MacMurray and the girl's father - the always lovable Charlie Ruggles - fight back in a massively heinous - and equally implausible - way.
But first... they take a long time-out for a preposterous little comedy routine involving the light inside a refrigerator. Surely this joke was already old in 1937?
While ping-ponging back and forth between tragic melodrama and vaudevillian silliness, "Exclusive" coughs up some of the most unbelievable plot twists one can possibly imagine. It's like the script was cobbled together from leftover bits of several very different movies, none of them very good in the first place.
Ultimately, the only reason to watch this crazy goulash of a movie is to savor MacMurray and Farmer, both giving their all in the face of a relentlessly schizoid script. Farmer is particularly endearing, whenever the tangled storyline allows.
I'm giving "Exclusive" a fairly generous 4 out of 10. It's just barely worth seeing as a curiosity - but I can't imagine wanting to sit through it more than once.
Things start out innocently enough, with MacMurray as the crusading editor of a local newspaper, aiming to expose a gangster - Lloyd Nolan doing what he does best. The gangster cleverly ups the ante by buying a rival newspaper to promote his own version of reality. And to top it off, he even hires MacMurray's girl, played by Frances Farmer, to be his star reporter.
As if that's not galling enough, under Nolan's tutelage Farmer inexplicably - and very implausibly - turns full-on evil, churning out muck-raking stories with wild abandon. MacMurray and the girl's father - the always lovable Charlie Ruggles - fight back in a massively heinous - and equally implausible - way.
But first... they take a long time-out for a preposterous little comedy routine involving the light inside a refrigerator. Surely this joke was already old in 1937?
While ping-ponging back and forth between tragic melodrama and vaudevillian silliness, "Exclusive" coughs up some of the most unbelievable plot twists one can possibly imagine. It's like the script was cobbled together from leftover bits of several very different movies, none of them very good in the first place.
Ultimately, the only reason to watch this crazy goulash of a movie is to savor MacMurray and Farmer, both giving their all in the face of a relentlessly schizoid script. Farmer is particularly endearing, whenever the tangled storyline allows.
I'm giving "Exclusive" a fairly generous 4 out of 10. It's just barely worth seeing as a curiosity - but I can't imagine wanting to sit through it more than once.