teetoh666
Joined Oct 2006
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews9
teetoh666's rating
Great quality anime but it requires to know the backstory in order to fully appreciate it, as most of the reviews on this site seem to indicate. Should have checked them in details before I decided to watch it.
I'm not an expert of the genre. Went to the theatre with my family (2 kids aged 8 and 10). Neither of us know the manga. My eldest liked it. My youngest didnt. I reckon it is difficult to get into it fully if you do not know the manga beforehand.
This being said the story was good and character development is well done.
This reminded me a lot of the anime from the 80s titled Attacker You! (Atakka Yu!). I'm not familiar with volleyball but the players who watched this movie seem to have found the experience very pleasant.
I'm not an expert of the genre. Went to the theatre with my family (2 kids aged 8 and 10). Neither of us know the manga. My eldest liked it. My youngest didnt. I reckon it is difficult to get into it fully if you do not know the manga beforehand.
This being said the story was good and character development is well done.
This reminded me a lot of the anime from the 80s titled Attacker You! (Atakka Yu!). I'm not familiar with volleyball but the players who watched this movie seem to have found the experience very pleasant.
Sadly some ratings on IMDb are deceiving, and the 7-ish stars on this film make no sense to me, just like for "the cabin in the woods" at the time.
The main character does great acting and he is the only genuine talent in this production. There's no character development for any other role and you only get confused or bored by what's happening.
The end makes no sense and gives a feeling the director realized already 2 hours were gone and he had to find an ending to this mess.
I wonder why the great and talented Rosamund Pike ended up in this disappointing flick.
Please give me these 2 hours of my life back.
The main character does great acting and he is the only genuine talent in this production. There's no character development for any other role and you only get confused or bored by what's happening.
The end makes no sense and gives a feeling the director realized already 2 hours were gone and he had to find an ending to this mess.
I wonder why the great and talented Rosamund Pike ended up in this disappointing flick.
Please give me these 2 hours of my life back.
I have a well paying job, and I cost big bucks to my employer.
The writers of this film should therefore pay me back $ 200 for wasting 90+ minutes of my precious spare time at attempting to watch this. Besides, my wife also wants some money back for spending her time with me watching this.
It is visually aesthetic, that is true.
However, it is some kind of abstarct, genre film that does not deliver, the plot makes little sense and the whole point of the film remains yet a mystery to my brain.
The actors lack charisma.
If you want to see Vincent Lindon at his prime, just know he acted in so many better movies.
How this film won the Palme D'Or prize in Cannes is another mystery to me, well, I guess this depends also on who waas part of the grand jury.
3/10 for the visuals.
The writers of this film should therefore pay me back $ 200 for wasting 90+ minutes of my precious spare time at attempting to watch this. Besides, my wife also wants some money back for spending her time with me watching this.
It is visually aesthetic, that is true.
However, it is some kind of abstarct, genre film that does not deliver, the plot makes little sense and the whole point of the film remains yet a mystery to my brain.
The actors lack charisma.
If you want to see Vincent Lindon at his prime, just know he acted in so many better movies.
How this film won the Palme D'Or prize in Cannes is another mystery to me, well, I guess this depends also on who waas part of the grand jury.
3/10 for the visuals.