shadowfakx
Joined Jan 2007
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews2
shadowfakx's rating
but a microcosm ---( sp?) tautly directed, acted and beautifully filmed ( from Europe to Pakistan and places in between)--- of the geopolitical ambiguities that will plague this world for decades to come.
Played out exquisitely by the extraordinary Ann Brochet, she reflects with every nuance one face can engender, the uncertainty about her and her overlord's choices about preventing an "islamofascist" terrorist attack in France.
Two points: She is the handler for a man who has no commitment to this endeavor other than to get out of a French prison where he is serving a 12 year term. He has ethnic attributes which make him a plausible mole. For virtually all of the flick she is resolute in her goal to prevent this attack from taking place. However, as she forms a " bond " with her ersatz agent, she does waver ( near end game ) in the tactics her overlords use in handling the operation, and thus, him and herself. The guys in white hats, we realize, have no compunction in engineering " little " betrayals to accomplish their goals---which, after all, are correct and proper. So purely speaking, their white hats aren't as white as idealists ( if there are any of you left out there ).
Second point: the same goes for the "other " side...handlers and agents alike.
These 2 points make for one of the most provocative interplays between good and evil i've seen in quite some time. Make no mistake, there are good and bad guys, here....but not as black and white as some of us might feel comfortable with. So not your typical Clancy plot lines, here.
Finally, re: the other commenter's remarks regarding the final scene with the little boy making his way through the room where the plot is almost finally hatched: it clear and plain how he does it; no mystery there; with all due respect, he or she might have followed that part a little more clearly. I also disagree with her/his perception that Ann Brochet's character went to a home filled with kids and hubby. No indication of that. In fact, to the contrary.
This script could have resembled one of Le Carre novels which never properly received the directorial and acting talent so demonstrative in this flick. Except for the Smiley series that were made years ago, starring the inimitable Alec Guiness as George S.
Played out exquisitely by the extraordinary Ann Brochet, she reflects with every nuance one face can engender, the uncertainty about her and her overlord's choices about preventing an "islamofascist" terrorist attack in France.
Two points: She is the handler for a man who has no commitment to this endeavor other than to get out of a French prison where he is serving a 12 year term. He has ethnic attributes which make him a plausible mole. For virtually all of the flick she is resolute in her goal to prevent this attack from taking place. However, as she forms a " bond " with her ersatz agent, she does waver ( near end game ) in the tactics her overlords use in handling the operation, and thus, him and herself. The guys in white hats, we realize, have no compunction in engineering " little " betrayals to accomplish their goals---which, after all, are correct and proper. So purely speaking, their white hats aren't as white as idealists ( if there are any of you left out there ).
Second point: the same goes for the "other " side...handlers and agents alike.
These 2 points make for one of the most provocative interplays between good and evil i've seen in quite some time. Make no mistake, there are good and bad guys, here....but not as black and white as some of us might feel comfortable with. So not your typical Clancy plot lines, here.
Finally, re: the other commenter's remarks regarding the final scene with the little boy making his way through the room where the plot is almost finally hatched: it clear and plain how he does it; no mystery there; with all due respect, he or she might have followed that part a little more clearly. I also disagree with her/his perception that Ann Brochet's character went to a home filled with kids and hubby. No indication of that. In fact, to the contrary.
This script could have resembled one of Le Carre novels which never properly received the directorial and acting talent so demonstrative in this flick. Except for the Smiley series that were made years ago, starring the inimitable Alec Guiness as George S.
Superlative depiction of small town English life, postwar. Not to be taken lightly ...though the conflicts are shrouded in a comedic fashion, the message about integrity and courage in the midst of low down, mean spirited adversity can and, just, maybe should be taken seriously. Curious characters as well as the stereotyped dwell here...yet, even the stereotyped---because of the quaint datedness of the production---just not that way in the 21st century.
What prompted me to even register, here, and vote and, then comment on this movie, was the incredible performance and beauty of Sarah Churchill. Simply a modern day competitor to Blanchette, Streep, et.al
What prompted me to even register, here, and vote and, then comment on this movie, was the incredible performance and beauty of Sarah Churchill. Simply a modern day competitor to Blanchette, Streep, et.al