frankl3
Joined Jan 2007
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews8
frankl3's rating
I'm quite surprised none of the reviews mentioned that this film is a full remake of another Mitchum film from 1955 "Man With The Gun"..
Same exact story with very minor changes and same problem : not much action while waiting for the final showdown which by the way was much better handled in "Man With The Gun".
But any movie with Robert Mitchum or Angie Dickinson is worth seeing.
And here you have them both.
But any movie with Robert Mitchum or Angie Dickinson is worth seeing.
And here you have them both.
Absolutely nothing to save. Boring, ridiculous, pathetic.
I can't believe the reviews.
People should try and learn what a good movie is, and what's a film director's job.
Hopeless. I couldn't pass the 20 minutes mark.
I can't believe the reviews.
People should try and learn what a good movie is, and what's a film director's job.
Hopeless. I couldn't pass the 20 minutes mark.
You know you're in trouble when what is sold as an action film has an intro that lasts just over one hour.
You've seen this story many times but that's not a problem if the game is played the way it should.
Unfortunately here the director seems to be a little too proud of himself and so every scene lasts way too long to give him time to show how good he is at creating a mood.
Wrong. No action, no mood, no credibility.
Too bad.