aysandeniro
Joined Apr 2007
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges3
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews12
aysandeniro's rating
THE ALIENS. This is the best thing we've gotten since Aliens! A true sci-fi masterclass that delivers pure nerdgasm for every fan. The intensity, style, and vision set a new standard-this is how sci-fi should be, now and in the future. Absolutely unmissable!.
Even James Cameron said he is hooked and he loves it very much.
Even James Cameron said he is hooked and he loves it very much.
James Gunn Really Knows What He's Doing
James Gunn is one of the few directors in Hollywood who actually knows how to make entertaining movies. He combines humor, emotion, action, and visual flair without losing focus or pacing. He's not just a skilled filmmaker-he's a true nerd who cares about his characters, the story, and the audience. That care shows in everything he touches.
I've followed Gunn's work since his feature debut Slither (2006), a weird and hilarious horror-comedy that set the tone for much of his career: gross-out humor mixed with heart, sci-fi elements with practical effects, and dialogue that's sharp but never pretentious. From that point on, it was clear he had a distinctive voice.
Super (2010) followed, and it was even bolder. A violent, low-budget anti-superhero film with a dark tone and unpredictable shifts. It was not designed to please a mainstream audience, and it didn't-but that wasn't the point. It was raw and uncompromising. Gunn doesn't make films to follow trends or check boxes. He makes what he wants to make. That's rare in this industry.
His breakout moment came with Guardians of the Galaxy (2014), when Marvel gave him a shot with a relatively unknown property. What he did with it was impressive. He took a team of obscure, weird, flawed characters and made them lovable. He made them work as a group, and more importantly, he made audiences care about them. The pacing, tone, and soundtrack were all handled with precision. Gunn made a Marvel movie that didn't feel like a Marvel movie-and it was a hit.
The sequel, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, doubled down on emotional storytelling. He used a superhero movie to explore family, trauma, and reconciliation, all while still delivering explosions and jokes. That balance-between chaos and sincerity-is what sets him apart. He's not afraid to let things slow down, to give characters space to breathe. Most directors in this genre don't do that. Gunn does, and it works.
When Disney fired him in 2018 over old tweets, it looked like Marvel had made a mistake. And they had. DC took advantage and hired him for The Suicide Squad (2021), which blew the previous version out of the water. Gunn turned a franchise that was basically dead into something fun, violent, and genuinely unpredictable. He brought in D-list characters and made them memorable. He brought stakes to a film that shouldn't have had any. He gave it personality.
Then came Peacemaker, the HBO Max series spun off from The Suicide Squad. It's arguably one of the most original things DC has ever done. It's loud, offensive, emotional, and strange-all at once. Somehow it works. It shouldn't, but it does. That's Gunn again. He takes creative risks, and more often than not, they pay off.
Now he's in charge of building the new DC cinematic universe. It's a massive job, but if anyone's built for it, it's him. He understands character-driven storytelling. He knows how to balance tone. And more importantly, he knows how to give a film identity-something most modern superhero films lack.
Some people compare Gunn to Tarantino. Not in style, but in attitude. Like Tarantino, he makes films with a strong personal stamp. He writes, directs, and builds his stories from the ground up. He's not a studio puppet. That's why his films stand out-even when they technically follow the superhero formula.
Gunn isn't perfect, but he's consistent. He takes risks. He doesn't play it safe. And that's why I'll keep watching whatever he makes next.
James Gunn is one of the few directors in Hollywood who actually knows how to make entertaining movies. He combines humor, emotion, action, and visual flair without losing focus or pacing. He's not just a skilled filmmaker-he's a true nerd who cares about his characters, the story, and the audience. That care shows in everything he touches.
I've followed Gunn's work since his feature debut Slither (2006), a weird and hilarious horror-comedy that set the tone for much of his career: gross-out humor mixed with heart, sci-fi elements with practical effects, and dialogue that's sharp but never pretentious. From that point on, it was clear he had a distinctive voice.
Super (2010) followed, and it was even bolder. A violent, low-budget anti-superhero film with a dark tone and unpredictable shifts. It was not designed to please a mainstream audience, and it didn't-but that wasn't the point. It was raw and uncompromising. Gunn doesn't make films to follow trends or check boxes. He makes what he wants to make. That's rare in this industry.
His breakout moment came with Guardians of the Galaxy (2014), when Marvel gave him a shot with a relatively unknown property. What he did with it was impressive. He took a team of obscure, weird, flawed characters and made them lovable. He made them work as a group, and more importantly, he made audiences care about them. The pacing, tone, and soundtrack were all handled with precision. Gunn made a Marvel movie that didn't feel like a Marvel movie-and it was a hit.
The sequel, Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2, doubled down on emotional storytelling. He used a superhero movie to explore family, trauma, and reconciliation, all while still delivering explosions and jokes. That balance-between chaos and sincerity-is what sets him apart. He's not afraid to let things slow down, to give characters space to breathe. Most directors in this genre don't do that. Gunn does, and it works.
When Disney fired him in 2018 over old tweets, it looked like Marvel had made a mistake. And they had. DC took advantage and hired him for The Suicide Squad (2021), which blew the previous version out of the water. Gunn turned a franchise that was basically dead into something fun, violent, and genuinely unpredictable. He brought in D-list characters and made them memorable. He brought stakes to a film that shouldn't have had any. He gave it personality.
Then came Peacemaker, the HBO Max series spun off from The Suicide Squad. It's arguably one of the most original things DC has ever done. It's loud, offensive, emotional, and strange-all at once. Somehow it works. It shouldn't, but it does. That's Gunn again. He takes creative risks, and more often than not, they pay off.
Now he's in charge of building the new DC cinematic universe. It's a massive job, but if anyone's built for it, it's him. He understands character-driven storytelling. He knows how to balance tone. And more importantly, he knows how to give a film identity-something most modern superhero films lack.
Some people compare Gunn to Tarantino. Not in style, but in attitude. Like Tarantino, he makes films with a strong personal stamp. He writes, directs, and builds his stories from the ground up. He's not a studio puppet. That's why his films stand out-even when they technically follow the superhero formula.
Gunn isn't perfect, but he's consistent. He takes risks. He doesn't play it safe. And that's why I'll keep watching whatever he makes next.
