windtar
Joined May 2007
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews31
windtar's rating
this movie was so childish.
watch the old 1940's nancy drew movies, they are much much much better.
the girl in the movie looks and acts like she's 13. nothing she does is believable.
they took a series of good mystery books and turned it into a movie for 10 year olds who probably never even read her books.
this movie was a insult to the nancy drew series.
they need to make nancy like 19-21, and have more serious stuff.
watch it if its free, and nothing else on.
i rate it a 3 on a stink-a-roo meter
watch the old 1940's nancy drew movies, they are much much much better.
the girl in the movie looks and acts like she's 13. nothing she does is believable.
they took a series of good mystery books and turned it into a movie for 10 year olds who probably never even read her books.
this movie was a insult to the nancy drew series.
they need to make nancy like 19-21, and have more serious stuff.
watch it if its free, and nothing else on.
i rate it a 3 on a stink-a-roo meter
I just watched it, absolutely awful.
This movie had terrible acting, dumb situations, and just... well....
Hardly any action, 1 boring dinosaur used twice, lol, well, other than 2 dead ones and a quickie underwater one, and 1 flying pterodactyl.
C. Thomas Howell and Bottoms acting were just bad.
They should be ashamed of themselves for not putting in more dinosaurs and cool stuff. I saw more action in the 1970's TV show land of the lost.
Watch the old 1960's version, way better.
Watch this version only if free and every other channel has infomercials on.
This movie had terrible acting, dumb situations, and just... well....
Hardly any action, 1 boring dinosaur used twice, lol, well, other than 2 dead ones and a quickie underwater one, and 1 flying pterodactyl.
C. Thomas Howell and Bottoms acting were just bad.
They should be ashamed of themselves for not putting in more dinosaurs and cool stuff. I saw more action in the 1970's TV show land of the lost.
Watch the old 1960's version, way better.
Watch this version only if free and every other channel has infomercials on.
if your expecting anything like the TV series, forget it.
heck, marshal will and holly aren't even related in this movie.
no kids under 13 should watch.
if your looking for anything serious, forget it.
if you don't like stupid, silly and childish humor forget it.
so much was fake and unrealistic, and dangerous situations were just left as unexplained, like how'd they get away from sleestacks in pylan, and how'd will get away unseen from 2 tyrannasouraus when in limo?
the bad language wasn't funny, and totally not needed.
i was very disappointed in the movie, but it was worth $1 from redbox.
but...... the graphics were good. it had some funny scenes.
it's worth a buck or 2 but only if you like 16 year old humor with not 1 ounce of reality
heck, marshal will and holly aren't even related in this movie.
no kids under 13 should watch.
if your looking for anything serious, forget it.
if you don't like stupid, silly and childish humor forget it.
so much was fake and unrealistic, and dangerous situations were just left as unexplained, like how'd they get away from sleestacks in pylan, and how'd will get away unseen from 2 tyrannasouraus when in limo?
the bad language wasn't funny, and totally not needed.
i was very disappointed in the movie, but it was worth $1 from redbox.
but...... the graphics were good. it had some funny scenes.
it's worth a buck or 2 but only if you like 16 year old humor with not 1 ounce of reality