chris_smir
Joined Jan 2008
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews4
chris_smir's rating
I understand that film maker had to present all possible scenarios that were heard but the American journalist made the documentary looked like stupid. However, it is obvious that certain people behind the curtains, threw a lot of dust in this whole investigation (maybe even in this documentary as well), if we could say that it was indeed an investigation that was fully independent.
I have seen better executed documentaries from Netflix. For such a serious case I would expect a better outcome. I have to say that French journalist and French husband saved this documentary by presenting the most logical side of this story, even if all are in the sphere of conspiracy.
I have seen better executed documentaries from Netflix. For such a serious case I would expect a better outcome. I have to say that French journalist and French husband saved this documentary by presenting the most logical side of this story, even if all are in the sphere of conspiracy.
This is a brilliant documentary for people who feel that there is more truth out there than the mainstream archeologists have spoken. Saying that there is an ongoing fight against Graham for many years by those mainstream sleepers who think that history is their own food to serve.
Evidence is there and clear and whoever can't see it's because he/she is biased. They have to explain to us how the hell some ancient sites are not given to people like Graham for further investigation. Ah?
I wish Graham had more time (or maybe a second season comes) to give more examples all around the world. If one person out there starts being skeptical, I think Graham's documentary is succeded.
Evidence is there and clear and whoever can't see it's because he/she is biased. They have to explain to us how the hell some ancient sites are not given to people like Graham for further investigation. Ah?
I wish Graham had more time (or maybe a second season comes) to give more examples all around the world. If one person out there starts being skeptical, I think Graham's documentary is succeded.
This is a movie for kids but kids should NOT watch it. The only good things is the CGI, but everything else: acting, storyline, plot are terrible. Seriously I wasted 1.5 hour of my life. However me and my friend had some fun at the end, thinking that this is a great parody!!!